BTW, the news outlet you quoted from, sfl.media, is one of the smaller outlets that often use Palantir as clickbait because the name guarantees traffic—surveillance fears, CIA rumors, political angles, investor debates, you name it.
The article you linked leans heavily on that dynamic. It doesn’t offer original reporting or technical analysis; it just amplifies the most sensational framing because that drives clicks.
I’m not dismissing your concerns, they are worth consideration, but that source is built to provoke, not to inform.
I appreciate the feedback RR.