Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cgbg
You miss my point. The prosecutor alleges they were there, but the defense has no voice to address the allegation until it goes to court. If the Grand Jury did not indict, the "evidence" is considered hearsay and suspect, which is why it is usually secret.

My issue is that the release of such "evidence" is intentionally voiding the principle of "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law".

If that viewpoint makes me a laughing stock in your eyes, I think it says more about you than me.

Have a great day, FRiend.

25 posted on 12/05/2025 12:11:47 PM PST by MortMan (Charter member of AAAAA - American Association Against Alliteration Abuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan

Context and details matter.

There will be plenty of opportunity to debate the merits of individual situations once we see the available data.

We don’t need to dress up as defense attorneys at this point.


27 posted on 12/05/2025 12:16:37 PM PST by cgbg (The master is nice only when the dog behaves as expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson