Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

I agree with you in principle and despise these cameras, but there is no expectation of privacy in public places.


45 posted on 12/07/2025 12:00:07 AM PST by Lazamataz (I figure if Charlie Kirk can die for free speech, I can be mildly inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

I partially agree that it isn’t the private company taking pictures of license plates or cars or even facial recognition that I find objectionable, as I do agree with you on the absence of expectation of privacy in public places.

What find illegal, illegitimate, and unprincipled is the deliberate purchase of those images and data by government via taxpayer dollars to intentionally bypass legal restrictions and laws that have been put in place to protect our privacy from a prying government that is ravenous for more and more data on individual citizens in their efforts to control them.


47 posted on 12/07/2025 5:48:38 AM PST by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson