Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Flavious_Maximus

I agree. If the average IQ is 100, why accept below average? Doesn’t make sense. And the average IQ of a democrat is probably below 85, so that would prevent them from voting which would be a good thing. I can’t think of one positive thing they’ve done, since JFK was president.


11 posted on 12/02/2025 7:27:48 AM PST by Omnivore-Dan (have to )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Omnivore-Dan
If the average IQ is 100, why accept below average? Doesn’t make sense.

They don't want intelligent people. They intentionally dumb down education toward that end.

24 posted on 12/02/2025 7:52:18 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Omnivore-Dan
If the average IQ is 100, why accept below average?

One standard deviation from the IQ average is 87, a normative that at 85 was normally ascribed as 'moron.' Below average is no way to start, Son.

51 posted on 12/02/2025 9:27:00 AM PST by Thommas (The snout of the camel is already under the tent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Omnivore-Dan

It’s a betrayal of the women receiving these sperm not to have any criteria at all. IQ should be at least 100 and the donor should have no criminal record. I’d like to say the donor should have a job or be in university. At least give the children a fighting chance of success. I had stupidly assumed that would be standard practice and that women would be given a choice that would include anonymous data on the donor.


61 posted on 12/02/2025 1:01:55 PM PST by JayGalt (For America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson