There has been a “color revolution” against Trump since 2015.
IIRC they had an issue when some in the military wanted to disobey orders to get CON-vid vax.
I commend every one of them for stepping up to be the face of the “and domestic” component of all those oaths I swore.
Mark Kelly is an actual Alien ... from Uranus.
What they did in that video was an abuse of the power of suggestion. They’re terrible, and if they were musicians performing before a live audience they’d be dodging rotten tomatoes and cabbage heads.
Yes, it’s a color revolution. No, I don’t think these “lawmakers” realize that. I doubt seriously they think that deeply. Hence, whoever organized this for them is the likely culprit and should be sent to jail.
The FBI should be dragging all 6 of them in for grilling. At least throw a scare into them.
All six of them are up for rescue at a local pet rescue center. Get yours now.
The official “U.S” Senate AOC Nut Squawd that formed itself to defend foreign illegal alien invaders from Federal Law Enforcement Officers. American “veterans” my arse. They run an escort service for illegal alien foreign invaders and their shyster lawyer “advocates”.
I don’t see why this is not an act of treason. Is a soldier in the field the right one to decide what is a “lawful order”? Are they mature enough to refuse orders? Nope. Throw these people in jail and try them for treason.
There’s another dirty secret here. There are many military personnel who are not particularly loyal or patriotic. They enlisted strictly for pay and benefits. Many of them don’t AT ALL support President Trump’s deportation of illegals. I’ve seen and heard it myself many times.
IMHO this video was released specifically to target this addled cohort.
In view of all this in the essay. It is incumbent upon the existing patriotic cadre in the military to remind their youngsters of what the law really says In letter as well as the spirit of the law.
THEY CAN TAP-DANCE ALL THEY WISH
THEY ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY
Copperheads.
It's meant to undermine the authority of the President. What are Republicans in Congress doing about it? Anything? I haven't heard much from them.
Great analysis and perspective on the Seditious Six.
Here’s the deal - elected members of either the US House of Representatives or the US Senate may make the most seditious of statements WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE, if first they express the sentiment from the floor of either the House or the Senate. So trying them for sedition is out of the question. Secondly they speak of “illegal” orders, not “unlawful” orders, again scrambling up the terms. “Illegal” orders may, in the context of what they are saying, may actually apply ONLY to “orders against illegal immigrants” in their dog-whistle alarm to the illegal immigrants, and all the time those orders by the President were entirely valid LAWFUL orders, made in conformity of existing US Law.
Not one, NOT ONE, of these accusers of the President can cite what “unlawful” order has EVER been issued by the President in absence of a legal ruling to the contrary. Ruling after the fact does NOT apply to the validity of the action prior to the ruling. It only means that that particular measure cannot be taken again, unless the judicial ruling is overturned by a higher court.
I assume that these speakers are not just exercising their free speech rights in a general way. So what was their motivation specifically? Two things come to mind and both are related to the drug cartels. Trump is ridding the country of illegals. The cartels are in the illegals smuggling business and demand for their services is significantly diminished. Trump is interdicting the flow of drugs by blowing the cartels boats out of the water and costing them millions. Trump is using our military and IC resources to battle them on their own turf in black ops. These are unconventional actions for a US President that is showing success. Democrats who routinely oppose anything he does are more specifically threatened by these actions. It would be interesting to see if an investigation of these particular Democrats turned up links to the Cartels or their business interests.
Surely you jest.
Does the Constitution charge the Federal government with repelling that invasion?
Clearly yes.
Are ICE officers minimally invasive agents of that charge?
Obviously.
When rich leftists organize and fund sometimes violent protests and harassment of ICE officers and their families, does that justify the use of National Guard to protect them in their duties.
Quite rationally.
Can those guardsmen execute an arrest of violent "resistors" to that end?
Surely
If a State governor abets that harassment, is that governor violating the chain of command from the CIC?
Quite arguably.
Then how is any of that illegal? Trump should have issued an order to both Pritzger and Noisome and then could subsequently threaten arrest.
Where I think Trump is wrong is to use NG troops to enforce public safety. That is clearly a State function anywhere outside DC. It's a very bad precedent that opens us to government seizure of our firearms.
The article comes closer than any other to stating my belief that these cowards hope to engender service wide resistance as a first step toward a military coup. And this follows years of illegal acts to kill, neutralize, arrest, convict, bankrupt the President, all failures. So, even failing at assassination, the hope becomes a revolution to storm the gates. What they see as their positions in the post-Trump revolution is unclear, but one thing is clear: They all have theirs, having done serving and now reaping the benefits of the service. From such a throne of security and comfort, they encourage young, malleable minds to jeopardize their careers and lives, something they never would have had the courage to do while serving.