Posted on 11/22/2025 5:10:59 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Fox News anchor Bret Baier interviewed David Grusch, the Air Force intelligence officer turned whistleblower who previously testified before Congress about secret U.S. crash-retrieval programs involving non-human craft.
In the interview, Grusch reaffirms and strengthens his core claims:
1. The U.S. has recovered non-human craft and biological remains.
He states directly that the government has retrieved vehicles of non-human origin, and that non-human biological entities were recovered with some of them.2. He personally saw classified reports and photographic evidence.
Baier presses him:3. Multiple U.S. administrations have concealed this information.“With your own eyes you saw it?” Grusch answers: “Yes.” He says he had partial access to program data and intelligence reports confirming these recoveries.
Grusch says the cover-up spans years and multiple administrations and that people have been threatened or pressured not to testify. He himself says he was physically threatened before filing his complaint with the Inspector General.4. The current President is fully briefed and aware.
He states that the current administration is “very knowledgeable” about the reality of UAPs and implies that Trump could reveal more if he chooses.5. Other nations (Russia and China) have similar programs.
Grusch says he saw intelligence describing adversarial crash-retrieval programs, confirming this is part of a global competition.6. The origin of the intelligence is unknown.
He avoids calling them “aliens.” Possibilities include extraterrestrial, interdimensional, or unknown origins—he won’t speculate beyond what he directly saw.7. Their motives appear mixed and unclear.
He says the intelligence community sees a range of behaviors, some benign and some not, and that their intentions are not well understood.8. Congress now has a formal UAP task force.
Grusch serves as an adviser and says the government is slowly moving toward more transparency.Bottom Line of the Interview
Grusch openly tells Bret Baier—and a mainstream national audience—that:Fox News treats it as a serious national security and transparency issue, not a fringe topic.
- the U.S. has recovered craft not made by humans,
- has recovered non-human biological remains,
- he has personally seen classified evidence of it,
- people involved have been threatened,
- and other world powers have crash-retrieval programs too.
So we have their bodies and their craft, did the guy say where they’re from? How about their DNA? Their written language? Cell structure? Religion? Where’s their AI or quantum technology? What did they breath? Was it a private craft or some nation/ society/ world organization?
IOW there would be all the specifics and entire branches of science built around studying them. Not just “yeah we got the bodies and dissected them and it’s all secret”.
I've never understood that part at our destination end of the journey.
“The Soviet Union despised religion, and could have used this to attack religion.”
And thereby givng up secrecy. And what does religon have to do with this subject?
You must not be familiar with Genesis 6.
I don’t care who this particular UFO coin artist says he votes for you idiot.
I made an analogy.
And it’s also a good analogy with people who line up here to believe a lot of other conspiratorial bs.
I wish the UFO stories were true but they’re not.
These stories have been going on for at least 80 years. They have never been true.
Imagine travelling light years in a spaceship the likes of which we can’t even imagine and then have multiple crashes across the entire planet. I find that a tad hard to believe.
“They’re doing to the American people what they did to Bennewitz. “
A crime. Murdered him.
It’s time to have ICE go after these illegal aliens.
Because it’s not true.
You don’t find wreckage and bodies (and this has been claimed for 80 years) and even shoot some down, without knowing a boat load of everything about them.
I don’t even have to watch the video to tell you the guy said there is all this stuff he knows that he can’t tell us, or even he doesn’t know it all, smokescreens, etc.
You jump to ad hominems so quickly. I must have hit a nerve.;-)
You must be a Democrat (to use your weak analogy).
Killing someone and making it look accidental or totally natural is no problem for govt agencies with black budgets. Also who knows what he may reveal next if his story is true.
They caught Covid and died...
Imagine a being from another dimension that wants to convince humans that it is an alien from outer space. You leave a crashed UFO and say, “Oops.”
If you are convinced that all the stories are lies then you still have a fascinating mystery on your hands.
Why the lies?
Remember—these “lies” are not just from alcohol or peyote soaked natives from the desert southwest that called into Art Bell—there are all sorts of military and intelligence folks including the case discussed in this thread.
Books that would need to be deconstructed include these carefully researched tomes:
https://www.amazon.com/UFOs-Nukes-Extraordinary-Encounters-Nuclear/dp/1544822197
https://www.amazon.com/UFOs-National-Security-State-Chronology/dp/1571743170
https://www.amazon.com/UFOs-National-Security-State-1973-1991/dp/0967799511
https://www.amazon.com/UFO-Crash-Retrievals-Investigation-1978-1994/dp/0359685080
Good point. He had better hope he doesn’t piss off Hillary. He’ll be dead by Monday.
BTW he might be a conservative but he praised Trump because he was on Fox and a con artist targets his audience.
Or maybe he’s MAGA but who cares.
He’s pushing a deli. Because he’s full of baloney.
I once sat in a philosophy class and a dopey fat student told the class he was in the service and they found this metal “egg” and nothing they could do to even chip off a piece to analyze. Finally they strapped it to an atom bomb and set it off. NOTHING happened to it EXCEPT now it’s ticking!
The professor ate it up and yelled at me when I said it wasn’t true.
Famed scientist Enrico Fermi is famous for his question, “Where is everybody?”, which summarizes the Fermi Paradox: the apparent contradiction between the high probability of extraterrestrial civilizations existing and the lack of evidence for them.
He didn’t say that aliens don’t exist, but rather that their absence in the universe is a profound and unanswered question, given the vast number of stars and potential habitable planets.
Fermi’s reasoning was that with billions of stars and the likelihood of many having planets, and some of those planets developing life over billions of years, there should have been enough time for at least one civilization to have spread across the galaxy.
Fermi’s famous question: Over lunch in 1950, Fermi reportedly blurted out “Where is everybody?” when discussing UFOs and the possibility of alien life, leading to the paradox being named after him.
The lack of any clear evidence for aliens’ existence, despite the high probability, is the puzzle.
Fermi proposed no definitive answer, but his question highlights the mystery that continues to be explored today.
You may be correct. Or not.
I’ve been watching this at arm’s length for decades, never quite believing but not ignorant to evidence.
If there is merit to these claims,
1. To survive in our biosphere an alien species would have to have engaged in genetic modification coupled with hybridization with humans. It is arguable that there is evidence of everything related as such,
2. If the technology permits advanced travel, it stands to reason that such ‘portals’ would be located either in near space or within our atmosphere. It is also arguable that there is evidence related as such,
3. In order to hide statically (i.e., when not in transit), such hiding places would most certainly be in remote locations underground. It is also arguable that there is ample evidence of multiple locations around the globe, including at least 2-3 here in the U.S.
4. Insofar as to why another species would find value in an overpopulated rock surrounded by both a protecting magnetosphere and oxygen rich atmosphere, there really are only two academic questions:
a. At what point - i.e., When? - are they finished with the overwhelming majority of the human population infesting the planet,
b. Who survives to act as protectorate for the same (the entire planet cannot succumb or it will be poisoned by dozens of nuclear reactors melting down, coupled with various industries spewing their poisons likewise into the environment, coupled with the fact that ‘humanpower’ is a valuable resource, e.g., as slaves/servants to superior species, obviously in far lower numbers than today).
The rest of all of this is, frankly, theater. An interesting drama to view but in actuality a tragedy in the making: I fail to believe that a superior species sees value in 99-99.999% of the current population on Earth if they can adapt and use it for themselves.
That’s as far as my meager time invested in the topic over decades has taken me (those views were arrived at decades ago and reinforced over time) and I hazard the thought of investing more mental energy on the topic than it took to type this post. /s
Reports and/or stories of UFO’s have been around for thousands of years, not just the last 80.The fact that Rubio the SOS goes on camera to tell us that UFO’s are real and a matter of national security makes one want to sit up and take notice. He would not be out there saying this unless his actions were sanctioned by the IC. The information is coming out, slowly as to not cause any social disruptions. Sorta like things you might do if all the evidence was dropped all at once.
What about the possibility that Grusch is telling the truth about what he has been told—but what he has been told is incorrect and any documents (for example) provided to him were disinformation?
Does that make Grusch a liar and con man?
There are other possibilities here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.