“indicted for conspiracy to murder, maim or kidnap in a foreign country”
The real questions should be what gives the US gov the right to charge someone with a crime they haven’t committed and even if they did it would’ve been outside the US jurisdiction. I can see if the foreign country asked for extradition. They sound crazy, a mental institution would be the place to start.
Its a thought crime.
I’d like to know the section and title of which federal law they were indicted under and how the seemingly prosecutorial overreach in enforcing said law. I could see charging them while in the midst of committing the act that they’re accused of. If they’re successfully prosecuted and convicted it’s likely that it’ll become a movie.
All it takes is some act in furtherance of the conspiracy to make a chargeable offense.
I am puzzled that you would ask such an asinine question. If you want the exact citation you might want to do a search of the USC where I am sure such charges are mentioned.
Oh and they did allegedly commit a crime. Conspiracy is a crime. Conspiracy to commit murder in a foreign country is a crime. Production of child pornography is a crime.
They are crimes even if it would have involved the murder,and rape of Haitians.