To: DallasBiff
I agree that the sentiment behind this is seditious. But, they are telling the military to do something that is already built into the UCMJ-a duty to disobey unlawful orders. It would be difficult to prosecute any of them for saying this.
8 posted on
11/19/2025 9:49:00 AM PST by
GMThrust
To: GMThrust
I remember taking that exact training some 40+ years ago. I wonder if they still get similar training today.
10 posted on
11/19/2025 9:54:36 AM PST by
Dutch Boy
(The only thing worse than having something taken from you is to have it returned broken. )
To: All
I agree that the sentiment behind this is seditious. But, they are telling the military to do something that is already built into the UCMJ-a duty to disobey unlawful orders. It would be difficult to prosecute any of them for saying this.
It is NOT “built in” to the UCMJ nor are the democrats cleverly disguising anything. The UCMJ states that orders are always deemed to be lawful and if there is to be a challenge to them, the person must follow a precise process after obeying those orders. Of course a military member could recognize a blatant order like “shoot these children on the spot” but that’s an implied response to such an order and the UCMJ is very clear on following your chain-of-command’s orders, THEN protesting them.
16 posted on
11/19/2025 10:02:42 AM PST by
brent13a
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson