The interview is with the head of Kirk’s security
And there was a summary of him
Maybe you missed the first header post ?
Included is the assumption the relevant points were going to be covered.
Sorry you aren’t satisfied.
Not that YOUR approval means squat to me /-)
...some people...
No, I’m perfectly fine with what you posted.
I was responding to the OP who claimed that a summary is unnecessary, and Freepers are unnecessarily whiny, for a thread started with a 3-hour video.