Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 11/15/2025 7:25:53 AM PST by Taxman
A woman in her late thirties posts a simple complaint online: “Men can have kids into their seventies. I’ve only got a few years left. That’s so unfair.”
Within hours, her mentions are a war zone. Some men sneer about “geriatric eggs.” Others write manifestos about feminism and hypergamy. A few women defend her, but the thread collapses into the same argument we’ve been having for decades.
In Britain, a thirty-four-year-old woman recently sued her ex-boyfriend, claiming he had “stolen her childbearing years.” After ten years together, he ended the relationship without fulfilling his promises of marriage and children. Now, she’s demanding enough compensation to pay for in vitro fertilization, arguing that at her age, the damage is irreversible. The story, which may or may not be apocryphal, made international headlines (New York Post, Nov. 9, 2025).
None of this is about fairness. It’s about biology.
Both scenes expose the same raw truth: the difference between men and women starts in the body. Women face a narrow reproductive window and carry the heavier cost of sex and childbearing. Men can father children for decades and are built to compete for access. That single asymmetry — who can bear life, and when — shapes everything that follows.
Feminism can deny it, but it can’t erase it. The entire struggle between men and women — resentment, rivalry, dependency, love — traces back to unyielding biological facts.
Biology and the Social Machinery
Men and women were never designed for identical roles. Men are stronger and more expendable. Women are fertile for a brief span and pay a higher price for reproduction. Left unmanaged, that imbalance leads to chaos: predation, jealousy, neglect. Civilizations that survived learned to harness male aggression into protection and tie sexual access to responsibility.
That is where social machinery began.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The result is that a lot of young women are sleeping with the same 10-15% of men, while the other 85% of young men are lucky to get a smile from a woman.
Then those women hit 30, realize that the uber-attractive men will never commit to them (there aren't enough to go around anyway), and go looking for one of the 85% of men they looked down on before. By that time, those men have figured out the game, and have (a) worked themselves into the top 15%, and are bedding 22 year olds; (b) are looking for wives abroad; or (c) have simply given up on marriage or family.
Feminism is social suicide.
No imagination needed. Men live with the car running all the time. It faces cliffs, oceans, ravines - not just "safe" directions. It's not an "emergency" brake that's holding it back. It's a man's willpower, commitment, morality, and the awareness of consequences.
And the one you're calling an "idiot" who made it run all the time? That's God Himself.
An increasing number of women believe the Feminist lie that it's empowerment to sleep with a man but are now learning the hard way that they were a Slump Buster at best or just a throwaway convenience for Chad, Tyrone, Pookie, or Ray Ray.
It is no flex at all for a women to fornicate. Chad, Tyrone, Pookie, or Ray Ray are always up for it if she's better looking than what's available that night. If not, there are always orbiting simps a woman keeps around just in case. Women don't always cheat but they do know who's next.
There’s no such thing as “free sex”.
Period.
L
And given that The Left and the government were mostly male for the majority of the groundwork-laying (let's not pretend women invented much of this) it seems that the responsibility for the mess still lies in male hands. On the right we have the men who want women for childbearing, on the left we have the men who want us for sex, and our votes. But we aren't really the prime movers in much of this. We're the territory, by your own admission.
Yep. And that's all I'm saying. But men share blame about as well as they share housework.
Hate to break it to you, but women don't turn to men for their society. Our social lives are largely comprised of our female friends. You know, the people we actually talk to while the men are playing video games?
No, it's just nice to know you can do it without being tied to that man forever, bearing his children year after year, and hoping like hell he doesn't turn into an alcoholic, or a gambler, because you are dependent on him, and trapped. I agree that our present situation is not very good. But I still don't want to go back to the days when I wasn't allowed the choices I have had.
Another silly post by you, women are the voters and there will always be evil politicians to exploit the voters they can win over to create the government the left wants, whether it be a female Kamala, or a male Mandani.
You have some strange politics and views of conservatism for a conservative site with your strong support for the most destructive element and politics of the left and denigration of the right.
Yuppers
#120
.
Us big dumb males worked our butts off while “Miss Amigo” ran off with our
Best Friends....
.
Ain’t bitter
That is why the title is “Free Sex Costs Everything”
You are the one who said “since the left and government took control of females.” Marx’s first name wasn’t Karla, bub. Until men take some responsibility for this mess, it’s not going to get any better.
and that little piece of paper takes care of a lot of stupidity on the part of others
Please explain! I don’t understand!
Regards,
****************************************
Real simple.
Everything goes to her since she is my spouse if I go first, not anyone else who wants my stuff.
No questions asked or allowed.
Instead of picking better men, with the intent of potential marriage, women pick deadbeats because they can drop then when convenient.
The two groups who don't get a choice are the taxpayers who get stuck with the bill and the children who get destroyed for life. Both of those groups are now pushing back.
The other group that is exercising their choices are the potential stepfathers, "If society demands that I clean up the mess that these single mothers willingly chose with Pookie and Ray Ray, that society can go rot. I'm out."
These globalists really believed that men would tolerate raising dirtbags' children, sired with delusional, entitled mothers.
“””””“since the left and government took control of females.””””””
aka Won their vote and support, you seem to support that vote with thinking they improved America and freed women from God and the natural order of life and biology.
Men are not responsible for cleaning up this mess but it will end up being men who clean it up, because women won't.
Add in Munchausen by Proxy and it's a whole other level of sick.
I have no way of knowing… I hope so
“Marxists intentionally sold the lie to women because men gained nothing from it and wouldn’t buy it.”
This wasn’t the first time a woman was deceived by the serpent...
Which is why I keep saying that women who want children had best be very careful. Feminism is an option best left for women who actually want to be free. Not all women should be wives and mothers, because not all men make good husbands and fathers.
If all men were good husbands and fathers, I suspect feminism would never have become an issue. It was a reaction, not some random mutation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.