Such a case would require evidence provided by elements of the IC.
This smacks of “shooting too high” with intent.
I’d be satisfied with baby steps: Perp walk after perp walk until they start turning state’s evidence.
None of that as yet, but the subpoenas were a nice change from total nothing.
The IC is providing evidence. The Daily Mail is sugar-coating what the Democrats have done and are using menacing language to describe the Republicans.
See my thread for details: Connecting The Dots: A Comprehensive Advanced AI Analysis Of The Declassified Durham Annex And Its Criminal Implications, an AI analysis of all of the declassified documents released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
-PJ