Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PGalt

Is he above the law because he is a Senator?


10 posted on 11/09/2025 4:52:11 AM PST by FreedBird (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FreedBird

Don’t know. It appears that many in the “legal” profession are above the law.


18 posted on 11/09/2025 5:08:21 AM PST by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FreedBird; All

http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html


19 posted on 11/09/2025 5:09:11 AM PST by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FreedBird

No - more specifically, a Democrat Senator.

Republicans are below the law. The bogus case against Senator Ted Stevens back in 2008 causing him to lose his re-election in Alaska is why we have Obamacare now. It wasn’t tossed on a technicality it was tossed as being completely bogus.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/judge-lambastes-prosecutors-dismisses-ted-stevens-conviction-1.814451

https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/murkowski-aghast-that-stevens-prosecutors-will-not-be-disciplined

Stevens almost certainly would have won re-election with his usual 30 point+ blowout but for his bogus indictment and conviction. Instead, he narrowly lost, giving the Democrats their 60th seat to have cloture on Obamacare’s initial vote. Then after that, even with Scott Brown’s upset victory in Massachusetts, it was too late to stop it, as they were able to pass the House’s amended version on reconciliation which does not require 60 votes.


40 posted on 11/09/2025 12:53:06 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FreedBird

No - more specifically, a Democrat Senator.

Republicans are below the law. The bogus case against Senator Ted Stevens back in 2008 causing him to lose his re-election in Alaska is why we have Obamacare now. It wasn’t tossed on a technicality it was tossed as being completely bogus.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/judge-lambastes-prosecutors-dismisses-ted-stevens-conviction-1.814451

https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/murkowski-aghast-that-stevens-prosecutors-will-not-be-disciplined

Stevens almost certainly would have won re-election with his usual 30 point+ blowout but for his bogus indictment and conviction. Instead, he narrowly lost, giving the Democrats their 60th seat to have cloture on Obamacare’s initial vote. Then after that, even with Scott Brown’s upset victory in Massachusetts, it was too late to stop it, as they were able to pass the House’s amended version on reconciliation which does not require 60 votes.

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/03/report-blasts-prosecutors-in-stevens-case-074056

“Federal prosecutors knowingly concealed exculpatory evidence and allowed false testimony to be presented at trial in their overzealous pursuit of criminal charges against the late Sen. Ted Stevens, a scathing new report by a special investigator finds. “The investigation and prosecution of U.S. Senator Ted Stevens were permeated by the systematic concealment of significant exculpatory evidence which would have independently corroborated Senator Stevens’s defense and his testimony, and seriously damaged the testimony and credibility of the government’s key witness,” Schuelke wrote in the summary of his report.”


42 posted on 11/09/2025 12:56:08 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson