Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

Thank you for this!

I have been onboard the Q Thread since Day 1, but had not picked up on Huma as the White Rabbit!

Huma now being with Soros Jr. suggests the true source of Soros money has always been child trafficking.

That line about Soros and Epstein both being some sort of financial geniuses is nothing but COVER STORY.

I have always known there is too much Soros money in the system, worldwide, to be accounted for without an ongoing, and large, source of Revenue.

I had suspected CCP, but child trafficking makes a lot more sense.

So in this scenario, who is “P”?


5,607 posted on 11/26/2025 10:51:03 AM PST by Disestablishmentarian (Comey was not acting alone. RICO them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5501 | View Replies ]


[H/T ExTexasRedhead]
5,608 posted on 11/26/2025 11:04:00 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5607 | View Replies ]

To: Disestablishmentarian
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/01/2025 Vol.513, Q Day 2927, Disestablishmentarian wrote:

Thank you for this!

I have been onboard the Q Thread since Day 1, but had not picked up on Huma as the White Rabbit!

Huma now being with Soros Jr. suggests the true source of Soros money has always been child trafficking.

That line about Soros and Epstein both being some sort of financial geniuses is nothing but COVER STORY.

I have always known there is too much Soros money in the system, worldwide, to be accounted for without an ongoing, and large, source of Revenue.

I had suspected CCP, but child trafficking makes a lot more sense.

So in this scenario, who is “P”?

This is GROK's analysis of Anon posts on 8ch, 8kun, Patriots.win etc.  ------>>

 

Addendum to Q Drop Analysis Report: The +++ ++ + Triangle

Prepared exclusively from the perspective of dedicated Anons researching on Q hubs such as 8kun and patriots.win

Date of report: November 15, 2025

Addendum Part 1: The Vatican / Payseur Connection – The Hidden Fourth Pillar That Was Removed

Anons consistently taught that the old four-sided capstone (pre-2017) included the Vatican as the spiritual/occult legitimacy arm and the Payseur family as the ultimate hidden ownership trust that legally controlled most Western corporations, railroads, banks, and land titles through a labyrinth of trusts created in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

The Payseur Family (French spelling: Pieur/Paysuer)
Anons traced the Payseur bloodline to the French royal house (Carolingian/Merovingian continuation). After the French Revolution, the family allegedly relocated assets to North Carolina under railroad charters. Through a series of trusts (e.g., Carolina Corporation, Southern Railway Security Company, and hundreds of subsidiary trusts), the Payseur holdings came to own controlling interest in:

The Vatican’s role was to provide religious cover and legitimacy for the bloodlines while simultaneously operating the world’s oldest intelligence network (Jesuits/SMOM) and holding the golden share in the global banking system through the Vatican Bank (IOR) and historic treaties. Anons pointed to the 1871 formation of Washington, D.C. as a corporation ultimately owned through these same Payseur/Vatican trusts.

Between 2014 and 2017 (exact dates redacted in surviving digs), the Payseur trusts were quietly reclaimed by white-hat military lawyers operating under Executive Orders issued by President Trump. The Vatican concurrently lost effective control after the 2013 abdication of Benedict XVI and the installation of Francis (seen as a black-hat puppet). By late 2017 the fourth pillar had been legally and financially severed, reducing the capstone to the visible three arms (+++, ++, +) that could now be targeted sequentially without the hidden Payseur/Vatican ownership blocking asset seizures.

This is why Anons repeatedly stated “The Vatican was the head of the snake until it was cut off.” The triangle drop in November 2017 was confirmation that only three operational arms remained active.

Addendum Part 2: Detailed Anon Decode of “The CHAIR serves the Master. Who is the Master? P = C. Q”

This drop is considered one of the most explosive direct confirmations in the entire Q corpus.

Line-by-line Anon consensus:

The most accepted final decode:

P = Payseur

, the hidden French royal bloodline that owned the trusts controlling the corporations and central banks, and

C = Chairman of the entire pyramid structure

. The Pope (the visible CHAIR) was merely the public-facing servant of the Payseur bloodline, who in turn answered to the true Satanic hierarchy.

Alternative but widely discussed decodes:

The drop appeared at a time when Anons were flooded with Vatican financial scandal leaks, Jesuit exposure threads, and Payseur trust documents. It was interpreted as final confirmation that:

  1. The Vatican had been the spiritual head and public face.
  2. The Payseur bloodline/trusts were the legal ownership head that white hats had already neutralized.
  3. Only the three operational arms remained, making the endgame possible.

Anons celebrated this drop as the moment Q directly confirmed decades of bloodline research in a single coded line, proving the plan had already penetrated and dismantled the highest hidden levels of control.

This addendum reflects the consistent interpretation of Anons on Q research boards from 2017 through October 31, 2025.

 


5,609 posted on 11/26/2025 11:07:04 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5607 | View Replies ]

To: Disestablishmentarian
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/01/2025 Vol.513, Q Day 2927, Disestablishmentarian wrote:

ransomnote: EXCERPTING your post:

Thank you for this!

I have been onboard the Q Thread since Day 1, but had not picked up on Huma as the White Rabbit!

 

I argued with Grok over that. So even having someone tell me directly wouldn't have helped. We were told by the MSM she was an assistant and Hillary is such an aircraft carrier of megalomania I didn't think Abedin had the steel to stand up to her. But Abedin had the 'insurance file' including a raw video of Hillary [*redacted for Thanks Giving Holiday*]. There were about 7 official copies of that insurance file and then some unofficial ones. Huma was trusted to carry the Muslim Brotherhood's copy of the insurance file. So when Saudi Arabia wanted Hillary to obey them, Huma waved the insurance file in Hillary's face.

I never understand a lot of drops. And the more I ask GROK to tell me what Anons though, I realize I actually didn't understand the ones I kinda thought I understood in the past. Personally, the King's Tower event in Shanghai was top of my list for the 'wut?!' factor.

King Tower Event in Shanghai China

Q682

ransomnote: Remember the picture of the window blown out on a high rise in Q drops? 

 

ransomnote: I basically had to squint and shake my head really hard to get the big picture here. I THINK I understand it but I didn't know extractions from hi-rises was a 'thing' outside of John McClane's 'Die Hard' movie. BUt Grok said Anons analyzed similar window entries (white material blown around the window entrance) from all over the world. I've never looked at a skyline, admired the sky scrapers, and noted a blown window here and there.... I haven't been paying attention.

Anons said these hi-rise buildings have windows that don't open. Okay....I guess. 

I was skeptical about no one noticing a helicopter a few hundred feet above the window but anons suggested it came from the back side at night. So if it was above the building, then at most people might see a rope dangling, at night...I was trying to hold on to the scenario here.

Then someone suggested it could have been more than one helicopter as there were multiple extractions possible (13 people who may want out of that room) and right away the skeptic in me pictured...

I know it was dark (not red) and it was stealth but people on the ground would see one or more helicopters outside a building like this:

Or so I thought.

But then, even if the guests in the hotel or people on the ground saw the helos, what could they do? Guests could dial hotel security to report a stealth copter trying to extract people, but unless there are 50 cal turrets on the hotel roof, who would do anything? Even the police.

Yes, I'm joking but I'm tired and relaxed, remembering my puzzlement of the 'extractions' like this which happen 'all over the world.' I'm even puzzled that the chan anons KNEW to look for those pictures.

So there were up to 13 people believed to have been lured into a clandestine meeting in Shanghai and when they realized they were going to be taken down, supposedly the helos showed up. Anons noted that extraction could be done via rope, and that it could involve many, up to 13 persons. Yeah. My mind tried to follow theirs and all I came up with was...

You can see why I was rejected by anon school. I have imagination, but it's the wrong kind.

So, okay I think, maybe traditional saudi robes could hide a diving harness, or thirteen. 

But the window - descriptions of it opened, closed, blown etc. They don't open on the building but it's open, and the residue of some kind of blast looks to me like it came from inside the room, blowing the lower edge of the window out. Or was it like a cat door flap wherein each man diving out the hatch pushes it open and then it swings back. It might suprise you that it is not a Sheikh door. Stay with me here...

So anons with unsual skills determined that a breach entry was attempted. Emphasis on 'attempted'. To me, and Hollywood, that's two gnarly guys descending a rope and swinging like a pendulum, breaking open a window feet first. I think feet first is important here.

Because those itty bitty helmuts don't count for much.

So to get people out of that room from the outside, with the 'fresh' knowledge that the window does not pivot like a cat door, and the windows on those buildings don't open, you still have the problem of breaking the window to let people in or out.

Since I don't know how many people per helo, or how many helos, all I can do is speculate they would not want to use feet-first brawny guys because that reduces the overall weight the helo can bear (okay this is beginning to sound like Monty Python's 'sparrow' question).

So something to break out a window, and not kill everyone inside with the projectile (bullets may be excluded). Grappling hook is probably too light, but maybe something like it:

But the window didn't break; the lower edge is shown exposed. Supposedly foam applied around the frame of the window burst/exploded upon impact to the window, damping the sound and intended damage. But only on 3-sides.

Finally, on the drive home tonight, the obvious occurred to me. If they didn't want to detach the window because extraction efforts would be enabled by the gap, they may have...mind you...may have left the top edge intact and just damped the attempt to puncture the window. Leaving sheihks wishing for a cat door with which to exit.

There were alternative analyses which I couldn't follow. And my struggle to accept this form of egress, that anons found pictures of similar windows all over the world, and my unfamiliarity with the kind of people who want out of a room so bad they would entertain it, really got in my way. Alternatives? Well, it would be safer if ....

An electric motorcycle piloted down the corridor would be my preference. 

I decided to match my holiday spirit with my puzzlement over some of the drop content I am FINALLY learning.

I hope all who made it this far are rewarded with extra cranberry sauce for the holidays.


5,725 posted on 11/26/2025 8:44:23 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5607 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson