What does it mean to the EV charging experience? You get what you pay for. Slow or nonworking chargers. Often no place to use the restroom while it charges. Lines of everybody else wanting the "free" charge.
But if you go to a charger you have to pay for, it's completely different. Last year I drove home from Canada (1,740 miles one way) and all but 2 of my charging stops were done in 10-15 minutes while I used the restroom. Clean restrooms and good food and drinks because you're paying for it -- they want you to have a good charging experience and stop again the next time you drive that way (and post on EV forum apps like Plugshare what your charge speed and experience was like).
One of those longer charging stops was because I let it charge more than usual (it slows way down after reaching 85% and going all the way to 100%) because I wanted to be out of the car for a while and walked across the street to get a bite to eat. So excluding the charging stop that I made take a while, the only charging stop that took longer than I wanted (it wound up being 25 minutes) was the one in Canada on a remote highway with few options (an early adopter at a restaurant and gas station with probably no ability to run a higher amperage power line out to that area).
End result? 32.5 hours of driving/charging/eating time to go 1,740 miles (not counting a 10 hour hotel stay and a half our of stopping to do work on my laptop). Which is about what time it'd take me to do the trip in a gas car. But only because I respected the free market to give me the better driving experience. (And because I researched ahead of time that the trip had plenty of fast chargers along the way, otherwise I would have taken my older gas pickup, same for if I had made the trip up north during the winter.) If I had expected a govt funded trip it would have taken a lot longer.
I think It is important and useful to share those experiences, at least I find them so.
The way I see it though, the problem is, while our electrical grid can handle the level of use educated and dedicated users such as yourself can put on it, it is in no way, shape constructed to provide that volume of energy draw to the users who would be forced to use it.
The fight over the EV mandate by 2035 in California (where I last saw 12% of the vehicles on the road are EV) is ongoing, but the point is they (and other blue states like my own) are fiercely pushing these, even though there are absolutely no plans to upgrade the infrastructure to make it even remotely possible.
No plans (except on paper, possibly) to upgrade the infrastructure that delivers the electricity. No plans (except on paper, possibly) to increase electrical energy generation.
2035 is now ten years away. California, with the largest economy in the United States, cannot supply water for drinking or crops reliably. They cannot provide water to fire hydrants. They are chasing industries out of the state. They are making it impossible to build new energy generation or even upgrade the power infrastructure.
Hell, they have a plan to renovate the State Capitol building which is in various states of deconstruction, and many people feel that project is going to turn out like the idiotic high speed rail system, go tens of billions over budget and never get built.
All this in the largest state economy in the union.
Everyone else is just punting this down the road, the only people who appear to be doing more than cow-farting into the wind when it comes to energy are the people in Trump’s administration, who are fighting tooth and nail with governments like the California state government and being opposed by environmentalists and globalists at every stage, just like those in California.
I use California as an example because they are ostensibly the most ambitious, but if they haven’t begun planning ten years ago to upgrade their energy infrastructure and implementing it, there is zero chance they are going to do that for ten years in the future.
Granted, there could be breakthroughs of some kind in battery or charging technology that would allow you to go further on the road and charge faster, but until those breakthroughs are made and are commercially viable and offered, they are just talk.
Again, I admire your pluck in making this choice for yourself and putting in the effort to make it a reality, but it isn’t going to work your way if another 40% (pulling that out of a hat) registered vehicles in your state go electric without the corresponding upgrades in energy generation or infrastructure upgrades, you may be able to charge at home, since I recall you have spent the time and money to be able to do that, but outside your home range it isn’t going to work for you.