Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
No, it’s because the fortress ruins there today didn’t yet exist.

If, as the article states, this fortress was built between 1550 and 1070 BC, most of that time period is well within the generally accepted time of the Exodus, between 1400 to 1200 BC.

16 posted on 10/27/2025 5:36:42 PM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: fidelis

Again, the dating is the issue. The fortress is misdated (it’s younger than that) because of the duplication of some of the New Kingdom dynasties.


22 posted on 10/27/2025 6:51:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (CNN is a funny way to spell [redacted], particularly the lack of the plural.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson