Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ScaniaBoy

He withdrew the confession. Probably at the behest of his lawyer. Pretty common in homicide cases.

CC


22 posted on 10/26/2025 1:38:06 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Celtic Conservative; gundog; Leaning Right

Thanks for the explanations. Difficult to keep updated given everything that goes on in the world today.

I am so grateful to FreeRepublic!


24 posted on 10/26/2025 1:41:45 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Celtic Conservative
"He withdrew the confession. Probably at the behest of his lawyer. Pretty common in homicide cases."

I'm not a trained (via a law school,) lawyer, but I would say I'm a upper class Jail-House Lawyer, been to my state Supreme Court writing legal brief's more than a half dozen times.

In my humble opinion, if a lawyer, who was trained by a legal school, and who has passed a "STATE-BAR-EXAMINATION," would be incompetent.

The very short answer that one and all will help you to understand why a lawyer would do this (Change the plea of Guilty to "NOT-GUILTY,") is I give you the "O. J. Simpson case.".

Although in my humble opinion O. J. Simpson was guilty as HELL, the prosecution "TEAM," FUBAR{ED} that case so bad, is why he walked. The trial spanned eight months, from January 24 to October 3, 1995.

In short, the lawyer(s) are looking for a "PLEA-DEAL," in this case, my thought is a "take the DEATH PENALTY," off the table, go for "Life {time prison,} Without Parole," and maybe a television in his cell, or some other very minor requests. (Examples of minor request{s}) say the prison that their looking to keep him in, only allows say one or two hours a day to be out of his cell, expand that by one hour, etc.

Not to mention, theirs always a chance maybe someone in law enforcement (i.e., the legal system, cops, prosecutors, jail-house guards, etc.,) violated his rights, etc., etc. His lawyers have the right to presume someone did, they just have to find that proof, present this proof to the court(s) and hope the judge / jury etc., agrees. Then don't forget the "AUTOMATIC-APPEALS," that some / most states have in DEATH PENALTY cases. Then theirs the REACH FOR THE SKY, Appeal to the United States Supreme Court.

In my best [actor] Al Pacino voice WERE JUST GETTING STARTED MOTHER "F-ERS."

36 posted on 10/26/2025 2:37:45 PM PDT by Stanwood_Dave ("Testilying." Cop's lie, only while testifying, as taught in their respected Police Academy(s). )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson