Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This could be why sharks are getting bigger.
1 posted on 10/17/2025 5:08:45 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Libloather

Gitmo-bound?


2 posted on 10/17/2025 5:14:10 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

And “feistier” if the cocaine spilled out.


3 posted on 10/17/2025 5:16:42 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (I pray that the sleeping giant has finally awakened and been filled with a terrible resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

...being that the survivors of the attack are, presumably, non-uniformed, non-sovereign, enemy combatants.


4 posted on 10/17/2025 5:17:09 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

They need bigger bombs. None of that 250 lb SDB crap. 2,000 lbs or bust.


5 posted on 10/17/2025 5:17:59 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Oh good—now sharks will be not just bigger but “higher”!


7 posted on 10/17/2025 5:20:03 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement! ThereonMaube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

a U.S. official tells Fox News.

Wait, I thought those days were over. Official who ?


8 posted on 10/17/2025 5:20:04 AM PDT by OldHarbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

It was a fishing submersible going for those fish in the deep.


9 posted on 10/17/2025 5:24:31 AM PDT by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

All kidding aside, the US needs to capture one of these vessels in tact and make a very public big deal about what it was actually transporting.
-
If for no other reason it will shut the doubters like rand paul up once and for all.


11 posted on 10/17/2025 5:36:16 AM PDT by V_TWIN (RIP Charlie Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

So our guys are transparent about it, and the left is in an uproar. They want these people to be arrested, and provied and attorney etc.

Maybe better to carry out the orders and keep your mouth shut about it.

THat’s not Trump’s way.

He’s got nothing to hide about this.

Everyone knows where he stands.

3 more months and there will be no drugs coming in to this country. YOu’ll tell when the prices go up for cocaine.


12 posted on 10/17/2025 5:42:08 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“Sighted sub, sank same.”

- U.S. Navy patrol plane over the North Atlantic on January 28, 1942.

https://www.aahs-online.org/pubs/journals/files/542109.pdf


13 posted on 10/17/2025 5:43:43 AM PDT by Leaning Right (It's morning in America. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Get back to basics!
IMG-5181
14 posted on 10/17/2025 5:45:39 AM PDT by The Louiswu (USA FIRST...USA FOREVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

WIKI

The First Opium War broke out in 1839 between China and Britain and was fought over trading rights (including the right of free trade) and Britain’s diplomatic status among Chinese officials. In the eighteenth century, China enjoyed a trade surplus with Europe, trading porcelain, silk, and tea in exchange for silver. By the late 18th century, the British East India Company (EIC) expanded the cultivation of opium in the Bengal Presidency, selling it to private merchants who transported it to China and covertly sold it on to Chinese smugglers.

In 1834, the EIC’s monopoly on British trade with China ceased, and the opium trade burgeoned. Partly concerned with moral issues over the consumption of opium and partly with the outflow of silver, the Daoguang Emperor charged Governor General Lin Zexu with ending the trade. In 1839, Lin published in Canton an open letter to Queen Victoria requesting her cooperation in halting the opium trade. The letter never reached the queen. It was later published in The Times as a direct appeal to the British public for their cooperation. An edict from the Daoguang Emperor followed on 18 March, emphasising the serious penalties for opium smuggling that would now apply henceforth. Lin ordered the seizure of all opium in Canton, including that held by foreign governments and trading companies (called factories), and the companies prepared to hand over a token amount to placate him. Charles Elliot, Chief Superintendent of British Trade in China, arrived 3 days after the expiry of Lin’s deadline, as Chinese troops enforced a shutdown and blockade of the factories. The standoff ended after Elliot paid for all the opium on credit from the British government (despite lacking official authority to make the purchase) and handed the 20,000 chests (with 1,300 tonnes or 2.9 million pounds) over to Lin, who had them destroyed at Humen.

Elliott then wrote to London advising the use of military force to resolve the dispute with the Chinese government.

A small skirmish occurred between British and Chinese warships in the Kowloon Estuary on 4 September 1839. After almost a year, the British government decided, in May 1840, to send a military expedition to impose reparations for the financial losses experienced by opium traders in Canton and to guarantee future security for the trade. On 21 June 1840, a British naval force arrived off Macao and moved to bombard the port of Dinghai. In the ensuing conflict, the Royal Navy used its superior ships and guns to inflict a series of decisive defeats on Chinese forces.

The war was concluded by the Treaty of Nanking (Nanjing) in 1842, the first of the Unequal treaties between China and Western powers. The treaty ceded the Hong Kong Island and surrounding smaller islands to Britain, and established five cities as treaty ports open to Western traders: Shanghai, Canton, Ningbo, Fuzhou, and Xiamen (Amoy).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars


18 posted on 10/17/2025 5:59:59 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Yes, fresh sushi.


19 posted on 10/17/2025 6:01:39 AM PDT by Ronald77 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Oh, boy...the ambulance chasers and ACLU will be all over these guys.


22 posted on 10/17/2025 6:08:14 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
I wonder what happens to the sealed bags of drugs that we see floating away after these air strikes?

If they follow the tides and eventually hit land, many will get back into circulation.

I'm all for hitting these speed boats but should we use incendiary bombs to burn all that crap up before if floats away?

23 posted on 10/17/2025 6:11:52 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE THE MOOSELIMB TERRORIST SAVAGES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

...Because we want to convict you and send you to prison for LIFE!

24 posted on 10/17/2025 6:12:45 AM PDT by jerod (Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Trump is really making it a pain in the ass for drug runners. He seals the Southern Border, so mules now have to use crossings, subject to search, he’s likely shooting down any drones crossing the border (we got a lot of practice on that in Ukraine), and he’s intercepting large-scale drug running operations.

The only downside is that if he keeps this up, the Cartels might get mad at him (just imitating our usual hand-wringers here!).


32 posted on 10/17/2025 6:55:53 AM PDT by BobL (Trusting one's doctor is the #1 health mistake one can make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
at least the sixth known incident in a quiet but intensifying U.S. military campaign targeting drug boats

That could explain why my fentanyl is getting so expensive.

37 posted on 10/17/2025 7:49:25 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

If new reports are true: the supply of drug boats will be drying up fast, along with the associated shore operations, manufacturing, and distribution centers. Not to mention some one snapping up the $50,000,000 bounty on Maduro’s head.


39 posted on 10/17/2025 8:14:38 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Trump gave a press conference a couple days ago. A panty-waist reporter asked “Why can’t we just capture these boats.” Trump’s reply was spot-on perfect (paraphrasing): “We’ve done that for 30 years and it does not work. It’s time for something new.”

When do we EVER hear government people admitting that their approach does not work and why keep repeating it? Why not try a new approach? I LOVE that he said that. Man, do I LOVE that.

I think that’s the first time in my life somebody in government has said “what we are doing does not work.”

Now apply that to welfare, SNAP, EBT, AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) and TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), etc., that have done nothing but create multi-generational public “assistance” dependency.


40 posted on 10/17/2025 8:26:50 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson