60 Minutes Investigates the Swine Flu Vaccine Fallout of 1976
(I doubt that Gerald Ford was smart enough to lie about it, but the cause of the 1920 "Spanish Flu" wasn't viral, it was Bacterial Pneumonia.)
Posted on 10/13/2025 12:25:59 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Red Badger]
SNIP
In 2016, Dr. Zervos crossed paths with Bigtree, who urged him to take on something public health had avoided for decades: a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Dr. Zervos agreed, determined to prove Bigtree and other vaccine skeptics wrong. At the time, he vowed, “Whatever the results, they get published.”
SNIP
Dr. Zervos agreed, and the study was completed in 2020. As Bigtree anticipated, the results were devastating for the vaccinated — but there was one major problem: Dr. Zervos chose not to publish the study.
In 2022, Bigtree convinced Dr. Zervos to sit down and explain why. Knowing the importance of the moment, he recorded the conversation on hidden camera.
There, Dr. Zervos openly admitted on tape why he chose not to publish the data. He said bluntly, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
• The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
60 Minutes Investigates the Swine Flu Vaccine Fallout of 1976
I sailed right through the Swine Flu debacle (college years). In fact, after I got done with K-12 I didn't have another flu shot for at least ten years. I remember how there was a backlash by the Demwits about some possible vaccine deaths, but not a peep out of any of the b******s when Ebola hit. It's all about party branding with them.
bkmk
now its a political football. no one will know the truth for years
Refused the jab, as did both of my sons.
The more stories like this that I see just reinforces my happiness!
Ok, big deal. You lost all your friends but this guy is still popular!
If that sort of thing matters to you.
It always pays to go look at the studies our resident Anti Jab fanatics like to post.
In this case when you check the link provided in post #5 you find:
“Retracted Article”
“See the retraction notice”
Oops.
When you follow the link to the retraction notice and click on the full text button you find:
“This retracts the article “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination” in volume 17, 8674.”
“The journal retracts the article “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses along the Axis of Vaccination” cited above [1]. Following publication, concerns were brought to the attention of the editorial office regarding the validity of the conclusions of the published research.
“Adhering to our complaints procedure, an investigation was conducted that raised several methodological issues and confirmed that the conclusions were not supported by strong scientific data. The article is therefore retracted.
“This retraction is approved by the Editor in Chief of the journal.”
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8345674/
“The CDC developed the PCR test without reference to the actual Covid virus. Instead, since the CDC said an isolated sample of the virus was ‘unavailable’, the CDC used a ‘related virus’.”
No PCR test could be possible without an actual virus as a specimen.
But since your post is just a rehash of the Daily Expose’s crackpot theory that “there is no Covid virus” it doesn’t matter how ridiculous the premise is.
But no one who hasn’t run PCR testing is going to know it’s bunk anyway. Con artists and conspiracy nuts prosper by exploiting the public’s inability to judge what they are being fed.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering, Pelham wrote: It always pays to go look at the studies our resident Anti Jab fanatics like to post.
In this case when you check the link provided in post #5 you find:
“Retracted Article”
“See the retraction notice”Oops.
When you follow the link to the retraction notice and click on the full text button you find:
“This retracts the article “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination” in volume 17, 8674.”
“The journal retracts the article “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses along the Axis of Vaccination” cited above [1]. Following publication, concerns were brought to the attention of the editorial office regarding the validity of the conclusions of the published research.
“Adhering to our complaints procedure, an investigation was conducted that raised several methodological issues and confirmed that the conclusions were not supported by strong scientific data. The article is therefore retracted.
“This retraction is approved by the Editor in Chief of the journal.”
You haven't been paying attention. Valid research, like the fact that Ivermectin and HCQ work well, was 'retracted' and denied through professional threats. The Deep State still has a hold on parts of the Administration.
That retraction notice was 'naturally' applied in 2021, long before President Trump took office in 2025. The Plandemic and 'vaccine' hoax was still in motion.
Retraction in
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering, Pelham wrote: “The CDC developed the PCR test without reference to the actual Covid virus. Instead, since the CDC said an isolated sample of the virus was ‘unavailable’, the CDC used a ‘related virus’.”
No PCR test could be possible without an actual virus as a specimen.
But since your post is just a rehash of the Daily Expose’s crackpot theory that “there is no Covid virus” it doesn’t matter how ridiculous the premise is.
But no one who hasn’t run PCR testing is going to know it’s bunk anyway. Con artists and conspiracy nuts prosper by exploiting the public’s inability to judge what they are being fed.
Nice try. But I found the meme below, tracked down the document and page number and found the text proving that the CDC said it did not have an isolated sample of the Covid Virus. CHina's release of the computer generated model of the virus stated that it did not have an isolated sample of the virus. THe pharmas developing the vax based it on thei computer generated model. They all lied.
Not only do I pay attention, I actually go read the sources you post just for the fun of it.
Finding that the “Bombshell” you posted was retracted for “conclusions (that) were not supported by strong scientific data” is par for the course.
Better luck next time!
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering, Pelham wrote: Not only do I pay attention, I actually go read the sources you post just for the fun of it.
Finding that the “Bombshell” you posted was retracted for “conclusions (that) were not supported by strong scientific data” is par for the course.
Better luck next time!
Learn to read. Discover that the truth was censored throughout the Plandemic, and articles were retracted which were valid because they wanted to hide the truth. Then, stop trolling me.
Those who aren’t terminally stupid (ahem) realize that the CDC was able to procure samples of the virus from Americans who were infected as early as January 2021
They didn’t have to rely on the fantasy about needing to use China’s published genome, they could acquire the Covid SARS-2 genome on their own once they were alerted that a new outbreak of SARS had been spotted.
They already had the original SARS genome from 2002-2003 to compare with. There had even been attempts to create vaccines to the original SARS but they were dropped when the original virus died out on its own.
I assume that Big Conspiracy neglected to mention this background since it wouldn’t really help the party line of “no virus ever existed, all of the deaths are from poison vaccines administered before the ‘plandemic’”.
The kook version is so much better than mundane reality. It’s no wonder it’s wildly popular among those who get secret messages from Q.
You are just making trash up. No need to ping me with your lazy lies.
“Learn to read. Discover that the truth was censored throughout the Plandemic, and articles were retracted which were valid because they wanted to hide the truth. Then, stop trolling me.”
Don’t you still have access to the Q Safe Space where non-believers can be prevented from exposing conspiracy nut nonsense, aka “trolling”?
If that article that you posted was valid, the retraction itself could be rescinded. They have had years to do it.
It hasn’t been. Go figure. Probably when the journal said it was retracted for “methodological issues and conclusions not supported by strong scientific data” they meant it.
You want to pretend it’s because “truth was censored”. No, they told you why it was retracted, you just don’t accept that your source was exposed as being a sloppy and invalid study.
Someone who never speaks of “plandemic” nonsense and who still supports the vaccines created to combat the SARS-2 virus is Donald Trump, who you pretend to support. Why do you think that you are smarter and better informed than he is? Is this some delusion of superiorty at work? Inquiring trollers wanna know!
“No need to ping me with your lazy lies.”
You and Schiff are two who probably shouldn’t accuse others of lying.
Classic response for someone who doesn’t want the truth out there.
Freepers should do better.
Go ahead and try to spin this. It won’t work but it’s nice to know who the parrots are.
Related: Cleveland Clinic did a study last flu season. They compared employees who got the flu vaccine with those who didn’t. Over 5,000 people in total. They found that those employees getting the flu shot were around 23% more likely to get the flu than those who didn’t get it. That’s negative efficacy.
Of course there will still be people blindly or dishonestly defending any and all vaccines.
“ Finding that the “Bombshell” you posted was retracted for “conclusions (that) were not supported by strong scientific data” is par for the course.”
Perhaps you missed the part where the guy who actually did the study was afraid to post the results because it would end his career. Hearing that, one might be suspicious of the “retraction”, but here you are, parroting the narrative without even a little bit of suspicion.
Do better
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
