Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

1920 letter?... No credibility.
G I Jane movie, 1997 a little more credible.
Physical ability required of the MOS a little more credible in 2025.

One doesn’t need super-strength to be a computer screen jockey . But they still need to be healthy, mentally alert. The biggest de-qualifier is alcohol and drugs.

Even in Vietnam alcohol and drugs were a bigger problem than physical strength. But strength was needed for most, but not all MOS.


6 posted on 10/05/2025 3:02:01 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: spintreebob

The fallacy of the left’s strawman argument is that every MOS, like, for instance, drone pilot, doesn’t “need” to be physically fit.

The right answer is, every armed serviceman SHOULD be fit enough to serve, anywhere needed, at any time needed, and fight if necessary. History is replete with examples of so-called rear echelon troops being called upon to fight in emergent circumstances.

For every marshmallow soyboy soldier, we could and hopefully will have a FIT soldier eager to do the same job and fill the position well. Build a credible force, lead it well, make service tough and honorable again and we won’t have any problem attracting the right kinds of recruits. If we build it, they will come. Thus it has ever been.


8 posted on 10/05/2025 3:59:01 PM PDT by SharpenedEdge (Stockpile. Prepare. Arm. Train. A Storm is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson