| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled GROK AI confirms President Trump's statements that the US no longer provides funds to Ukraine. All funds spent now are from prior Congressional Appropriations - no new ones planned, nickcarraway wrote: |
I read everything you wrote. You specifically said you supported a country starting a war. |
That's a mis interpretation. President Trump said most Americans don't know our State Department helped overthrow the Ukraine. CIA's Barbra Nuland is on tape picking Ukraines new installed government...NATO is responsible for building up fortifications and building an army to take on Putin. Merkel later admitted that they (NATO) only agreed to the last treaty to 'buy time' to build up Ukraine for the war. This is NATO's war and it's not over yet. NATO still wants to force regime change in Russia. NATO is not our friend. Neither is Putin. As I write this I see the futility in trying to communicate with you. You'll just distill what I write, if I finished it, into a false statement like the one that started me replying to you. As it stands, you have only a fragment of my answer to distort into some new accusation that doesn't fit me.
Explain to me why you are against the a preemptive war against an enemy of the U.S., but you rabidly support a preemptive war by a foreign country?
See, that's where you can't explain it to me. There is always a reason for war. So, whatever Saddam Hussein did, you say that's way beneath what Barbra (It's actually Victoria) Nuland's phone call was?
I mean think about it: if you say neocons are bad, then you say a stupid phone call is grounds to start a war? Talk about a major disconnect!?
If Nuland's phone call is justification for war, then the U.S. should be at war with most countries on earth! Certainly, the U.K., Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Iran, Turkey, Germany, Ireland, China, Indonesia, Myanmar, Brazil. Philippines, Afghanistan, Pakistan, oh, and Iraq again. There are more, but you get the point.
Why do you support Russian invasions for far less than the U.S.?