Replies

Still searching 2018 for likely candidates for indictments starting in Trump's first term which may be ongoing in his 3rd term. Lookin' at you, Big Tech.

Some excerpts of the following drop point to Big Tech (TWITTER, FB, GOOG, YT, REDDIT, etc.).

Q2171 EXCERPTS:
Sep 12, 2018 8:44:35 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No. 233
How do you demonstrate 'reasonable cause' to regulate and/or break up BIG TECH?

SNIP

BOMBS AWAY!
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-11/sessions-is-said-to-be-open-to-probe-of-social-media-giants
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/08/31/hey-google-facebook-twitter-trumps-got-point-need-to-do-better-job-self-regulating.html
MASSIVE FAKE NEWS ATTENTION FOR A 'CONSPIRACY' REDDIT BOARD BEING BANNED?
WHY ARE WE BEING TARGETED BY SOME OF THE LARGEST MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS ON THE PLANET?

There are many drops which point to the Big Tech companies they seemed to start in late 2017.

I was suspicious when some Tech CEO's started stepping down or seemingly divorcing in close succession. Perhaps the Big Tech CEO's were separating from their companies to face grand juries, hearings etc. Given their cases appear to be active in 2018, by 2021 they may have begun making plea deals or are challenging convictions. I'll cite the companies used by Q as examples:

Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter stepped down Nov 2021 (first Q drop 598 Jan 23, 2018)
Eric Schmidt, CEO of Alphabet (& GOOGLE) stepped down Jan 2018 (first Q drop 429 Dec 2017)
Susan Wojcicki, CEO of YOUTUBE resigned Sept 2018 (first Q drop 2061
Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit still in his position (hard to search Q drops for Reddit to isolate CEO only)
Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of FaceBook did not step down. Wiki admits he did attend two major hearings; likely there were many more because of all the cross connections among him and other Tech Giants. I think we have been lied to about the true scope of the hearings at which he and others testified, which continue to this day. His crimes were not minor - perhaps he has a deal for him to function as company head until prosecution of all the heads of the Face Book hydra concludes, and then he will be sentenced.
On March 25, 2021, Zuckerberg testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee regarding Facebook's role in the spread of misinformation and hate speech on the platform. During the hearing, he was questioned about Facebook's handling of user data, its role in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol Building,...
In a January 2024 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on child safety and social media platforms, Zuckerberg, along with other tech CEOs, were questioned about their companies' practices. During the hearing, he apologized to the families of children who were victims of online abuse and harm.^[91]^[92]
Zuckerberg received unwanted attention from Q in Sept 2018. In the photo he looks shattered.The Meme bears out what Q told us - DARPA's LIFELOG ended the day Facebook began on 02/02/04.
2075
Sep 03, 2018 10:28:10 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: ad0276 No. 2867109
DmHVdlrU8AAXDYo.jpg
FB outages today?
@JACK
Shadowbans lifted [24]?
Legal cover pre_testimony?
"Twitter denies the 'current' adoption of 'shadowbanning' re: political viewpoints etc…..no discrimination etc…..pride ourselves re: no censorship etc……open and transparent etc….."
>Twitter re_engages 'shadowbanning' across entire platform….
You've been a BAD boy [NP].
Q
Large companies are often allowed to survive the worst crimes of their CEO's and founders because if they are large enough, destroying the company destroys too many innocent people and related services/partner businesses. So some of these companies will be allowed to stabilize themselves with new leaders after cutting back all the crime and leaving the core of innocent people and services in hopes they will grow and thrive.
I found the stable of Big Tech CEO's at President Trump's inauguration, along with other Deep Staters (Clintons, Obama) inexplicable and it seemed as if they did too. Each CEO/Gov Official poses a signficant flight risk - perhaps the only way they were permitted to attend the event at all was as electronically monitored guests - security was not needed to protect them but instead to keep them there.
I was going to end there will end with this excerpt from Q3006
What happens when the C_A targets [spy + tech insertion] of GOOG, FB [LifeLog], Twitter, etc etc?
https://www.foxnews.com/tech/mark-ZUCKerbergs-conference-room-has-a-secret-panic-chute-report-says
What happens when people wake up to the fact that FB is a cover for LifeLog [DARPA]?
What happens when people discover all RT data [inputs + listening/camera/GPS meta] is being harvested and made accessible to Langley?
Charter of the NSA? DOMESTIC + FOREIGN?<br />Charter of the C_A? FOREIGN (NOT DOMESTIC (FORBID LAW))<br />Why is the C_A conducting an active umbrella collection campaign [stringer tangents to 9] against all US citizens through LifeLog [FB] absorb/tan targeting? <br />Bypass data encryption on phone/tablet etc?
Primary focus on elected officials?
Primary focus on elected officials in key sub committees?
Can activation occur of 'recording' local on device pre SCIF entry?
No logs.
No keys.
Ghost in-Ghost out.
People only engage security (+ escape vehicles) when they have something very serious to FEAR.
What is that FEAR for MZ?
Q</blockquote>