Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge in James Comey's case: Nachamanoff was given his first job out of law school by James Comey in 1995-1996 and hired again in 2002. He must recuse himself. immediately!
X.com ^ | Sep 25, 2025 | Donald Putin @DonaldPutine

Posted on 09/26/2025 9:04:00 AM PDT by ransomnote

September 25, 2025


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2025 9:04:00 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Who assigns cases????


2 posted on 09/26/2025 9:04:57 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

He WON’T RECUSE because that would be the RIGHT THING TO DO!


3 posted on 09/26/2025 9:05:29 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Push this up the chain. The DOJ must know about this.


4 posted on 09/26/2025 9:07:52 AM PDT by Lions Gate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lions Gate

It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.


5 posted on 09/26/2025 9:08:40 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

This is a clear conflict of interest.

He shouldn’t be given the opportunity to recuse himself.

He should be removed immediately.


6 posted on 09/26/2025 9:09:20 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

Is federal judicial refusal or not always and only up to the individual judge to recise themselves or not, on an honor system, subject only to removal from bench by congressional impeachment?


7 posted on 09/26/2025 9:12:51 AM PDT by desertsolitaire (hite sea. My grandfather shouted warning to anyone who would listen that the Titanic was going to st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: desertsolitaire

A judge must recuse themselves from a case if there is a conflict of interest, which includes any situation where their impartiality could reasonably be questioned, even if it’s just an appearance of bias rather than actual bias. The legal standard focuses on whether a reasonable person might doubt the judge’s ability to be fair. This process ensures fairness, maintains public confidence, and upholds the integrity of the judiciary, with federal and state laws often outlining specific grounds for disqualification


8 posted on 09/26/2025 9:13:42 AM PDT by aklurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

We’ve been here before. Their side never recuse themselves, while our side “does the right thing”.


9 posted on 09/26/2025 9:14:26 AM PDT by Bikkuri (We are all Charlie now. I am Charlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aklurker

Thank you. Should we expect this be followed to the letter or twisted and ignored to suit partisan leanings in these times? What is the recent history of this concept in actual action?


10 posted on 09/26/2025 9:16:08 AM PDT by desertsolitaire (hite sea. My grandfather shouted warning to anyone who would listen that the Titanic was going to st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“randomly assigned”


11 posted on 09/26/2025 9:16:40 AM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“potential” bias
“Recusal is the legal process by which a judge, juror, or other adjudicator steps aside from participating in a case due to potential bias, conflict of interest, or appearance of impropriety. This practice is fundamental to ensuring fairness and impartiality in legal proceedings, preserving the integrity of the judiciary, and maintaining public confidence in the legal system. Historical and modern legal frameworks outline specific grounds for recusal, such as personal or financial conflicts of interest, prior involvement in a case, or demonstrated bias.”

This is a direct conflict.
See the irony? “maintaining public confidence”.
His case is put in the court of a judge who owes him.
Incredible.


12 posted on 09/26/2025 9:23:21 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

The court


13 posted on 09/26/2025 9:28:13 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aklurker

Well, he could have refused as soon as he was assigned. But he didnt.


14 posted on 09/26/2025 9:29:22 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

15 posted on 09/26/2025 9:29:27 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vivenne

Recused not refused


16 posted on 09/26/2025 9:30:06 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Another “random assignment.”


17 posted on 09/26/2025 9:32:44 AM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Boo this. Case may be thrown out now.


18 posted on 09/26/2025 9:37:55 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Is a Managing Assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of hiring law clerks? I honestly don’t know. It seems like their job is more focused on advising US Attorneys in their district.


19 posted on 09/26/2025 9:38:57 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Rats never recuse, rats never resign.


20 posted on 09/26/2025 9:53:28 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson