[Dr. Sivana]

They have been -likely- informed that free speech does not include what they want it to in their whim It pretty much does, actually. IF you are willing to give up a widely watched platform and a paycheck. None of these clucks are, I guess.

[stanne]

They think it means they get to incite hatred. Their problem is sweet Charlie Kirk just got assassinated by a guy who was incited to hatred

We are done with it

However that’s not the issue. The issue is the FCC is doing their job. Kimmel just heard from his parent company also done with it degfending lies and libel and slander ti Trump’s successful legal team

So no. Free speech does not mean what these girls want it to mean Their hate sow is over

[stanne]

Per Charlie Gasparino,

“ The backdrop to all this is Carr, a longtime telecom lawyer who is the new sheriff of the broadcast industry. Carr has been warning networks large and small that he’s taking one of the most expansionary views of the agency’s regulatory edict to make sure programming is in the “public interest,” First Amendment concerns be damned.

His impact has been nothing short of dramatic: Paramount settled a suit with President Trump over CBS’s controversial interview with Kamala Harris during the 2024 campaign, fearing that the FCC wouldn’t approve its $8 billion sale to independent studio Skydance.”