I don’t think this is about declaring a residence state of the lowest state income tax. It’s about getting a favorable mortgage interest rate for a primary residence vs some other real estate holding.
They are now going to claim the Senate knew this ahead of time and did not care when it confirmed her. And therefore it is no “cause” for dismissal.
It’s a good argument, but I vaguely thought one of her transgressions was after being confirmed.
I agree with the basis for the investigation, being the mortgage aspect.
I only mentioned the homestead reference as a supplement to the investigation.
If they claimed primary residence on the mortgage app., but held homestead status on a different location, it would strengthen the case.