“To me, it is abundantly clear that if the shot did not come from the older guy who was initially dragged off, then it was a scoped rifle shooting from a much longer distance. Frankly, it is much more logical and practical to do that, as the distance involved would give the shooter at least a somewhat better chance of escaping. I would also hazard a guess that if a scoped rifle was used to assassinate him, the odds of a conspiracy go up manyfold.”
The hypersonic crack sound of a shot was clear on video posted from in front and a little to Charlie’s right that showed him being hit and slumping to the ground. I don’t know how actually close that video was or what it means as to how close the assassin actually was to Charlie when he fired. Didn’t seem to have a suppressor on it as the report was still loud.
Posted this on another thread; fits here too:
For Prez Trump, today must be deja vu all over again. This smells like a planned hit. Today was Charlie Kirk’s first day back on the college campuses as a major conservative voice, and staunch backer of Trump; he was a major player in getting Trump elected this last election.
The Commie left wanted him silenced. They aimed for the neck. If the bullets wouldn’t have killed him, his ability to speak out on conservative issues on campuses would most likely have been severely impaired. We must follow the trail (monetary or otherwise) back to its source to find out who is responsible for this heinous assassination. Start first with the Soros organization and work up or down from there. Something smells very rotten in Denmark.
Without any facts available to me that contradict what you have just said, I will assume that you are correct. I think it is logical that it was a rifle shot anyway, because even somebody close up holding a handgun is going to be shaking from nervousness and won’t be able to make a precise shot like the one that murdered Charlie, except by pure dumb luck. A scoped rifle held steady with a bipod or other rest is a completely different matter.