slaynews is lying as usual ... no “turbo cancer” was found ... study’s ACTUAL conclusions:
“The subjects who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality, and a risk of cancer hospitalization that varied by infection status, cancer site, and the minimum lag-time after vaccination. Given that it was not possible to quantify the potential impact of the healthy vaccinee bias and unmeasured confounders, these findings are inevitably preliminary.”
Conclusions
The subjects who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed almost half the risk of all-cause death after a median follow-up of 25 months.
We also observed an inconstant association between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer hospitalization, depending on infection status, cancer site, and the minimum lag-time between vaccination and cancer.
As the results might be influenced by the confounding effect of a differential healthcare utilization by vaccinated individuals, they must be considered preliminary, and further data are definitely required to elucidate the potential association between cancer and COVID-19 vaccination.”
Strangely enough Slay News is not lying, but other than libeling Slay News, you are not either. Slay News accurately reported findings found within the study. You have accurately quoted the abstract...
Here is a link to the full article in HTML: https://www.excli.de/vol24/2025-8400/2025-8400.html
Here is a link to the full study in PDF:
https://www.excli.de/excli/article/view/8400/5341
The big pink elephant in the middle of the room, is that despite the authors declaring that they have no conflict of interest, unless they want their entire study thrown in the “circular file” and memory holed by the politicians who funded it they have to write their conclusions and their summary in a way that obfuscates the actual findings within.
In other words, to preserve their funding and stay on the good side of politicians and entrenched Covid Vax pimps to preserve their careers they had to explain away facts found in the full article such as these: “The rate of hospitalization for cancer of any site was 0.85% in the unvaccinated group, and 1.15% in the group vaccinated with at least one dose (p<0.001). At multivariate analyses, the likelihood of cancer hospitalization was higher in the subjects who received at least one dose, compared to the unvaccinated.”
“The vaccinated subjects showed higher rates of cancer admission for colon-rectum, breast, bladder, and all hematological cancers (the latter only for the comparison with the group “≥1 dose”; Table 2(Tab. 2)). The multivariate models largely confirmed the univariate analyses. Vaccination with at least one dose was significantly associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for colon-rectum cancer.”
You might think that these two statements and many others found in the article, and study would be difficult to explain away but actually it is quite easy. They did this through various statistical means and circular reasoning. The phrase “lies, damned lies, and statistics” applies here. Statistics can be deliberately manipulated or misinterpreted to support weak arguments, making them misleading or even more deceptive than outright lies.
The figures quoted by Slay News were all directly from the article and study. I assume that the quotes you made were from the article and summary. You are well aware of this, but you choose to live in a Pollyanna world where big pharma, and politicians are acting in the best interests of those that they are supposedly helping, and those who try to call them out are “lying”.
the unfortunate thing for you is that this forum has many people who have seen with their own eyes the negative consequences of the Covid "vaccines" SO YOUR SH*T NO LONGER FLIES HERE!!!