Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Huh. Woolley’s excavation of Ur found a thick intervening layer. Between breaks in artificial barriers like levees and unusually large seasonal floods, it’s not unlikely that some ancient cities and towns that survive in the cuneiform have probably not been found because they were buried and never rebuilt. None of this has anything to do with a global flood as claimed in the clickbait.


25 posted on 09/02/2025 9:37:10 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

My crazy theory is that a maritime civilization grew and flourished in regions which are now under one or two hundred feet of seawater, and that the end of that civilization came surprisingly quickly as the glaciers melted. This then is why what I would call “fully developed” civilizations mark the beginning of civilizations as identified from the archeological record. They were the descendant cultures of those which had been washed away.

/tinfoil


27 posted on 09/02/2025 9:46:36 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson