Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: thepoodlebites

I explained that in my post 145.


161 posted on 09/14/2025 4:23:16 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg

I explained that in my post 145

No, you have not provided the website. If you did, I could review the information and get back to you. I believe the question is whether the images provided by NOAA are doctored. I can assure you that the GOES imagery is not doctored. Your flat-earth friend posted a NASA image of Earth from space. I was just asking for the website to determine whether the image was valid. Since you guys can’t provide the website, I conclude that the image was doctored by your flat-earth friends.

Maybe it would be good to review the first principle of scientific integrity:

The first principle of scientific integrity is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that. After you’ve not fooled yourself, it’s easy not to fool other scientists. You just have to be honest in a conventional way after that.

In summary, the idea is to try to give all of the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another.
Richard Feynman


162 posted on 09/14/2025 4:41:41 AM PDT by thepoodlebites (and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson