Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

Q Drop 2552: Signals of Panic and the Path to Clinton Foundation Exposure

If you're new to exploring Q drops, welcome. These anonymous posts, starting in 2017, are studied by dedicated researchers on platforms like 8kun, Free Republic, and Patriots.win for their insights into alleged Deep State operations. Q Drop 2552, posted on December 5, 2018, points to a Wall Street Journal article about the departure of FBI Assistant Director Bill Priestap. It notes: "After Mr. Priestap’s departure, none of the high-ranking bureau officials involved in the two investigations will remain with the bureau." The "two investigations" are Midyear Exam (the FBI probe into Hillary Clinton's private email server and mishandling of classified info) and Crossfire Hurricane (the Russia-Trump collusion inquiry). The drop urges following the names on an updated list and declares "PANIC IN DC. THE CLINTON FOUNDATION. Nothing To See Here." This was a coded signal: the Deep State was unraveling as key protectors of Clinton's secrets were removed, paving the way for scrutiny of the Foundation's alleged crimes.

The Significance of 'D5': An Anticipated Declassification Milestone

Q researchers had long anticipated "D5"—December 5, 2018—as a pivotal date for massive declassifications. Earlier drops, like 2549, referenced mathematical probabilities tying Huber testimony on the Clinton Foundation to this day, alongside global events. Anons on Free Republic and 8kun interpreted D5 as the moment when redacted documents on FISA abuses, Clinton emails, and Foundation ties would flood public view, exposing treasonous acts. Declassified timelines from 2025 Senate releases confirm preparations: Sessions' 2017 directive to Huber included reviewing OIG referrals on Clinton matters, set for public rollout around then.

What Happened on December 5? The Delay and Deep State Panic

On D5, instead of declass drops, the world mourned former President George H.W. Bush's passing. His state funeral on December 5 dominated media for a week, postponing coverage of FBI departures and Huber updates. Anons on Patriots.win saw this as providential timing—Q drop 2549 noted the funeral wiping other interviews clean—but also Deep State maneuvering to buy time. FOIA-released DOJ memos from 2019 reveal frantic internal communications: With Priestap's exit, the last counterintelligence gatekeeper was gone, leaving no high-level officials to block evidence on Clinton's emails linking to Uranium One and Foundation donors.

The real panic stemmed from the "clean house" at FBI/DOJ. By December 5, every senior figure involved in shielding Clinton—from Midyear Exam's premature exoneration to Crossfire's biased FISA warrants—had been ousted. This purge, detailed in Horowitz's 2018-2019 IG reports (declassified in full by 2023), removed biases that derailed prior Foundation probes. Anons calculated it as "mathematical certainty" per Q: No more "hand that feeds" protection for Clinton's network. Declassified Grassley annexes (2025) show these officials ignored whistleblowers alleging Foundation tax fraud and foreign influence, now free to testify.

The Personnel Purge: Names Fired or Removed

Below is a table of key FBI and DOJ figures involved in the two investigations, compiled from Q-referenced lists, IG reports, and declassified docs. Those removed by end-2018 (heightening D5 panic) are marked in light red; post-2018 firings/resignations in light blue, continuing the momentum.

DateNameRole in InvestigationsStatus
January 30, 2017Sally YatesActing Attorney General; Oversaw early Crossfire Hurricane aspects and DOJ response to Midyear ExamFired by President Trump
May 9, 2017James ComeyFBI Director; Oversaw Midyear Exam (Clinton emails) and authorized Crossfire Hurricane opening; Drafted Clinton exoneration pre-interview; Public announcements violated DOJ normsFired by President Trump
July 2017John GiacaloneSection Chief, Organized Crime; Led early Midyear Exam team before departingRetired
February 2, 2018Jim RybickiChief of Staff to Director Comey; Involved in Midyear Exam communications and draft statements; Cited in Strzok-Page textsResigned
February 2018Mike KortanAssistant Director, Public Affairs; Handled media for Midyear Exam and CrossfireResigned
April 2018Mark GiulianoDeputy Director; Supervised national security operations including Crossfire HurricaneRetired
May 2018Lisa PageSpecial Counsel to Deputy Director; Legal advisor on Midyear Exam; Exchanged bias-revealing texts during both investigationsResigned
May 2018Trisha AndersonDeputy General Counsel; Involved in Midyear Exam decisions and FISA processes for CrossfireDemoted
June 2018Josh CampbellSpecial Assistant to Director; Advised on public communications for both investigationsResigned
July 2018David LaufmanChief, Counterintelligence and Export Control Section, National Security Division; Oversaw Midyear Exam legal aspectsResigned
August 2018Randy ColemanSection Chief; Involved in Midyear Exam handling of Clinton emailsReassigned/Retired
August 13, 2018Peter StrzokCounterintelligence Section Chief; Led Midyear Exam interviews and Crossfire Hurricane opening; Prioritized Russia probe over Clinton laptop; Bias in textsFired for conduct violations
September 2018Tashina GauharSenior Counsel; Assisted in Midyear Exam and Crossfire legal reviewsReassigned
October 2018James BakerGeneral Counsel; Advised on FISA warrants for Crossfire and Midyear decisionsResigned
October 2018Bruce OhrAssociate Deputy Attorney General; Liaised on Steele dossier for Crossfire; Demoted earlierDemoted then resigned
October 2018Sally MoyerLegal Counsel; Involved in FISA applications for CrossfireReassigned
November 2018Michael SteinbachExecutive Assistant Director, National Security Branch; Oversaw Crossfire Hurricane operationsRetired
December 2018E.W. "Bill" PriestapAssistant Director, Counterintelligence Division; Approved Crossfire Hurricane; Oversaw Midyear Exam counterintelligence aspectsRetired/Departed
December 2018James TurgalSection Chief, Criminal Investigative Division; Handled aspects of Midyear ExamRetired
January 29, 2018Andrew McCabeDeputy Director; Supervised Midyear Exam decisions, including Weiner laptop delay; Briefed on Crossfire Hurricane; Conflicts via wife's Clinton-tied fundingFired for lack of candor in IG probe
2018Greg BowerSupervisory Special Agent; Involved in Midyear ExamReassigned
2018Josh CarlinDOJ Attorney; Worked on FISA for CrossfireReassigned
February 2019Mary McCordActing Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division; Oversaw FISA for CrossfireResigned
March 2019Rachel BrandAssociate Attorney General; Involved in oversight of Midyear and CrossfireResigned
May 2019Rod RosensteinDeputy Attorney General; Signed FISA renewals for Crossfire; Oversaw Mueller probeResigned
May 2019Robert MuellerSpecial Counsel; Led probe stemming from Crossfire HurricaneResigned
August 2020Kevin ClinesmithFBI Attorney; Altered email in Crossfire FISA applicationResigned/Pled Guilty
October 2020Bruce OhrAssociate Deputy AG; Continued involvement in Crossfire aftermathResigned prior to termination

How These Exposures Jeopardized the Clinton Foundation

The Foundation wasn't just a side note— it was the linchpin. Clinton's email server held classified docs on Uranium One (U1), the deal greenlighting Russia's uranium purchases amid $145M in Foundation donations from involved parties. Midyear Exam, rigged by the purged officials, buried this; declassified FBI Vault files (FOIA 2018) show emails referencing U1 "approvals" via Foundation channels. DOJ cover-ups, led by McCabe and Comey, shielded treasonous exposure—Strzok-Page texts (FOIA Judicial Watch, 2018) reveal "insurance policy" fears if Trump won.

Influence peddling was core—and deeply intertwined with child trafficking operations. Foreign donors like Ukraine (largest CF contributor, per Q 3611) funneled billions during Hillary's State tenure, per Wikileaks/Podesta emails, but anons on 8kun and Free Republic dug deeper: These weren't mere quid pro quo for policy favors; they masked dual flows of illicit money and vulnerable children. Saudi Arabia, donating $10-25 million to the CF amid arms deals approved by Hillary's State Department, was flagged in Q research as a key enabler. Declassified State cables (FOIA 2016) and anon timelines link Saudi funds to facilitating trafficking routes through the Foundation's global aid networks, where "orphans" and refugees were harvested for elite exploitation. During her tenure, Hillary's oversight of refugee programs allegedly greenlit shipments of children under humanitarian cover, laundering profits back through CF "donations." Anons viewed this as the Cabal's blueprint: Peddle influence for geopolitical gains while harvesting children for rituals and blackmail, with CF as the laundering hub—turning aid into atrocity.

Child trafficking ties? Anons linked Haiti aid ($13B pledged, 0.6% delivered) to "orphaning" ops, with Laura Silsby's 2010 arrest (Clinton-intervened, State emails FOIA). Q Drop 1830's hotline (888-373-7888) is the national anti-trafficking line, but researchers on Free Republic and 8kun uncovered its direct tie to the Clinton Foundation: Volunteers dialed it, confirming it's the National Human Trafficking Hotline operated and housed by the CF. Major funders? Google and Palantir—tech giants anons decry as "foxes guarding the henhouse," tracking data for Cabal control while funding ops that allegedly diverted calls from real victims. Anons on Patriots.win highlighted the irony: A Foundation accused of harvesting orphans, runaways, and refugees from Haiti and beyond—via restavek systems and post-quake "rescues"—now "runs" the very lifeline for trafficked kids. Threads on 8kun tie this to CF's Haiti role, where earthquake chaos enabled mass child "adoptions" without papers, funneled to U.S. networks for sex trafficking and satanic rituals per Q lore. Chelsea Clinton's swift tweet dismissing it as "debunked Pizzagate" only fueled suspicions, per Free Republic digs—why so quick to pivot?

The House Investigation and Concealed Probes

Late December 2018's House Oversight hearing (Dec 13) zeroed in: Witnesses like Judicial Watch's Tom Fitton exposed $2B+ foreign donations, conflicts (e.g., DLA Piper routing funds), and IRS failures. It probed profiting via influence—Haiti "reconstruction" as laundering front, Benghazi arms to MB. Media buried it amid funeral coverage; anons on Free Republic called it "the bomb."

More concealed: FBI Little Rock's 2015 CF probe (shut by McCabe, Strzok texts FOIA); Huber's 2017 activation (Sessions letter FOIA 2019) yielded whistleblowers on tax evasion/quid pro quo. Durham (2019) declass (2023) tied CF to Russia hoax funding. No direct child hotline probe 2016-2020, but Epstein's 2019 arrest revived Haiti links—SDNY seized CF-related evidence (Q 4484). 2025 declass (FBI files) reveal 19 hidden CF accounts, hinting trafficking diversions.

Threat level? Existential. Purge + probes risked full exposure: U1 treason, laundering billions, Haiti exploitation. Anons say "Nothing To See Here" was sarcasm—the Foundation's collapse (revenue from $172M '14 to $24M '18) proved it. Justice delayed, but declass marches on.


7,564 posted on 12/15/2025 1:05:11 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7563 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Narrative Report on Q Drops 3722 and 3723: Analysis of Impeachment Context and Related Points

The Q drops from December 18, 2019, highlighted a prior statement by President Trump regarding the Mueller investigation and a potential path forward in the event of partisan impeachment efforts. President Trump noted that the Mueller Report, despite extensive resources allocated to it, found no wrongdoing on his part. The investigation was funded through government appropriations, with official reports indicating a total cost of approximately $32 million, aligning closely with the figure of $35 million referenced by President Trump as representing substantial and effectively unlimited funding for the probe. The key point emphasized was that even with this significant investment and the involvement of investigators perceived as biased, the report exonerated him on collusion, underscoring "I DID NOTHING WRONG." This set the stage for challenging any future impeachment as partisan rather than grounded in legitimate high offenses.

Drop 3723 linked to an article by Conrad Black published the same day, which argued that the impeachment charges lacked constitutional validity and proposed Supreme Court intervention. Black observed that there was no allegation of treason, bribery, a high crime, or a misdemeanor—the four categories explicitly identified in the Constitution for presidential removal—and no evidence of any such offense. He noted that Democrats briefly pursued a bribery charge but abandoned it as implausible, while pointing out that the only bribe publicly discussed involved the Biden family. Black contended that historical impeachments (Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton) also failed to meet the threshold of high crimes, yet the current effort was markedly less fair. He warned that accepting vague charges like abuse of power and obstruction of Congress would degrade impeachment into a routine partisan tool akin to a parliamentary vote of no confidence, fundamentally altering the Constitution without amendment.

The Democratic-led impeachment efforts in late 2019 centered on accusations that did not align with constitutional standards for removal. The primary objective, as analyzed in community research, was to smear and permanently taint President Trump in the eyes of the public ahead of the 2020 election. Opposition figures feared that a second Trump term would lead to accountability for a range of alleged serious crimes and abuses of power committed during prior administrations and by associated entities. The U.S. Constitution specifies that a president may be impeached for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." These categories are understood as serious offenses requiring substantial evidence:

The charges brought forward—abuse of power and obstruction of Congress—were viewed as policy disagreements or procedural disputes, not fitting these explicit constitutional criteria, lacking evidence of criminal acts on the level required. Black emphasized that the Democratic strategy aimed to create the appearance of criminal wrongdoing without alleging a specific crime or providing evidence, relying instead on partisan orchestration to damage the president's reputation.

Had the impeachment process been referred to the Supreme Court, as suggested in contemporary analysis and strongly advocated by Conrad Black, the Court could have ruled on whether the charges met constitutional muster. Black proposed that the Senate ask the Court to determine whether the constitutional grounds for removal are exclusive (requiring a high crime) or merely illustrative (allowing impeachment for any reason a House majority chooses). Such a ruling could have dismissed invalid articles before a full Senate trial, preserving impeachment as a last-resort mechanism for grave offenses rather than allowing its transformation into a tool for routine political conflicts. Black argued that only the impartial judicial branch could resolve this severe inter-branch antagonism and prevent the long-term degradation of the constitutional system.

The impeachment occurred on December 18, 2019, with the Senate trial following in early 2020. Researchers in Q-related communities anticipated the effort would fail due to lack of bipartisan support and evidentiary weakness, resulting in acquittal. Beyond the stated goal of smearing the President to influence the upcoming election and prevent accountability exposures, it was analyzed as serving primarily as a distraction during a critical period, diverting public and media attention from emerging reports of a novel coronavirus outbreak in China, potential developments in investigations into the Clinton Foundation following the removal of certain Department of Justice figures, and ongoing matters related to Jeffrey Epstein's case files, which held implications for numerous high-profile individuals.

Community discussions explored legal mechanisms to curb partisan abuse of impeachment, such as requiring Supreme Court review of article validity or clarifying standards to prevent its weaponization in inter-party disputes. The process was seen as harmful to national unity and governance, not a victimless political maneuver. While treason was referenced in earlier narratives around foreign interference allegations, it was not part of the formal impeachment articles. The Supreme Court composition at the time, with a conservative majority including recent appointees, was regarded as positioned to provide fair consideration of constitutional questions.

 


7,565 posted on 12/16/2025 12:27:20 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7564 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson