https://www.congress.gov/115/crec/2018/06/28/CREC-2018-06-28.pdf
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION
OF H. RES. 970, INSISTING DE-
PARTMENT OF JUSTICE COMPLY
WITH REQUESTS AND SUB-
POENAS
Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speak-
er, by direction of the Committee on
Rules, I call up House Resolution 971
and ask for its immediate consider-
ation.
The Clerk read the resolution, as fol-
lows:
H. RES. 971
Resolved, That upon adoption of this reso-
lution it shall be in order without interven-
tion of any point of order to consider in the
House the resolution (H. Res. 970) insisting
that the Department of Justice fully comply
with the requests, including subpoenas, of
the Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence and the subpoena issued by the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary relating to potential
violations of the Foreign Intelligence Sur-
veillance Act by personnel of the Depart-
ment of Justice and related matters. The
resolution shall be considered as read. The
previous question shall be considered as or-
dered on the resolution and preamble to
adoption without intervening motion or de-
mand for division of the question except one
hour of debate equally divided and controlled
by the chair and ranking minority member
of the Committee on the Judiciary or their
respective designees.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr.
CURBELO of Florida). The gentleman
from Georgia is recognized for 1 hour.
Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speak-
er, for the purpose of debate only, I
yield the customary 30 minutes to the
gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr.
MC GOVERN), pending which I yield my-
self such time as I may consume. Dur-
ing consideration of this resolution, all
time yielded is for the purpose of de-
bate only.
GENERAL LEAVE
Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speak-
er, I ask unanimous consent that all
Members have 5 legislative days to re-
vise and extend their remarks and in-
clude extraneous material on House
Resolution 971, under current consider-
ation.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there
objection to the request of the gen-
tleman from Georgia?
There was no objection.
Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speak-
er, this morning I am pleased to bring
forward this rule on behalf of the Rules
Committee. The rule provides for con-
sideration of H. Res. 970, which insists
that the Department of Justice comply
with the request of the Judiciary and
Intelligence Committees. The rule pro-
vides for 1 hour of debate, equally di-
vided between the chairman and rank-
ing member of the Judiciary Com-
mittee.
Yesterday, the Rules Committee had
the opportunity to hear from Congress-
man JIM JORDAN, a fellow Judiciary
Committee member, as well as Rank-
ing Member JERRY NADLER. We also
heard from Congressman MARK MEAD -
OWS and Congressman SCOTT PERRY
and engaged in a vigorous discussion
that lasted a while in the Rules Com-
mittee yesterdayCONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H5821June 28, 2018
Mr. Speaker, oversight of the execu-
tive branch is one of the House’s most
important responsibilities and authori-
ties. As a member of the Judiciary
Committee, which has oversight over
the Department of Justice and the FBI,
it is a responsibility that I take very
seriously.
I believe the administration has an
obligation to comply with the commit-
tees of jurisdictions’ legitimate over-
sight requests and subpoenas. Unfortu-
nately, the Department of Justice has
not fully complied with numerous of
these requests, many of these which
stretch back several months. To illus-
trate this, let me lay out a timeline for
you.On November 3, 2017, Chairman GOOD-
LATTE and Chairman GOWDY, along
with additional Members, sent a letter
to the Attorney General and Deputy
Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, re-
questing five specific categories of doc-
uments. The deadline listed in the let-
ter was November 17, 2017. That dead-
line was not met.
On December 12, 2017, Chairman
GOODLATTE, Chairman GOWDY, and ad-
ditional Members sent a letter reit-
erating the expectation that the De-
partment of Justice provide the re-
quested documents. The deadline listed
in that letter was December 19, 2017.
Again, the deadline arrived, and again,
the deadline was not met.
On February 1, 2018, Chairman GOOD-
LATTE sent a third letter requesting
documents relating to potential abuses
under the Foreign Intelligence Surveil-
lance Act.
On March 22, 2018, the Judiciary
Committee issued a subpoena to Dep-
uty Attorney General Rod Rosenstein
compelling him to produce documents
and communications referring to inter-
nal DOJ or FBI management requests
to review, scrub, report on, or analyze
any FISA collection involving the
Trump campaign or the Trump admin-
istration.
b 0915
It also compelled the production of
communications relating to defensive
briefings provided by the Department
of Justice or the FBI to the 2016 Presi-
dential campaigns of Hillary Clinton or
Donald Trump.
Finally, he compelled production of
all documents and communications re-
ferring to proposed, recommended, or
actual FISA coverage on the Clinton
Foundation or persons associated or in
communication with the Clinton Foun-
dation. The deadline for this subpoena
was April 5, 2018. The Department of
Justice is in the process of complying
with this subpoena, but complete com-
pliance has not yet occurred.
Mr. Speaker, I believe that, in regard
to the subpoena, the Department of
Justice is trying to comply and is in
the process of doing so but, yet, has not
at this point.
I also share the frustration of my col-
leagues and the American people that
this process is taking way too long. We
need the answers, and we need trans-
parency. It is our duty to conduct over-
sight. The law charges us with shining
light where the government has fos-
tered shadows instead of providing an-
swers. The Department of Justice has a
responsibility to produce these docu-
ments and yet has not made them
available.
The resolution provided for by this
rule speaks to the core of our democ-
racy, the inherent tension between
branches of government that our
Founders intended and our responsi-
bility as a coequal branch to act as a
check upon the other branches.
Could this debate not happen at a
more appropriate time as we look to-
ward the Fourth of July and our coun-
try’s founding? This is why we were set
up the way we were.
The inherent tension has arisen most
recently out of the Department of Jus-
tice’s failure to timely comply with
congressional oversight. Some of the
documents this body seeks relate to
congressional inquiries that have ex-
tended almost the length of the 115th
Congress. They deal with some of the
most pressing issues in our government
today.
Has the Department of Justice
abused its FISA authority?
Was an investigation of national im-
portance affected by bias?
I believe that these investigations
need to play out, but I also believe
they can’t last forever. I also believe
that evidence of bias, a library of ex-
tremely troubling texts, and key per-
sonnel removals at the FBI illustrate
the heightened need for robust congres-
sional oversight.
As James Wilson, an architect of the
Constitution and Associate Justice on
the first Supreme Court so eloquently
stated: ‘‘The House of Representatives
. . . form the grand inquest of the
state. They will diligently inquire into
grievances, arising both from men and
things.’’ As a member of the Judiciary
Committee, I will continue to take
that charge seriously.
Yesterday, the Judiciary Committee
considered a similar resolution. Today,
the whole House has a chance to re-
sponsibly exercise its oversight respon-
sibility and reiterate to the Depart-
ment of Justice the need to fully com-
ply with our legitimate requests.
It is important to note that the
House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence has been similarly stymied
by delays to requests for information
and that certain documents have been
provided to only select members of
that committee.
This resolution insists that the De-
partment of Justice comply with the
requests, including subpoenas, of these
committees—one of which I proudly
serve on—so that the American people
can get answers and we can exercise
our proper constitutional duties. The
American people demanded answers,
and that is why Congress, Representa-
tives of the American people who an-
swer to the American people, are de-
manding that the DOJ answer to us.
Let this also serve as a reminder to
the Department of Justice that the
U.S. Congress was created by our
Founders, and its authority and re-
sponsibility arise directly from Article
I of the United States Constitution.
The Department of Justice, on the
other hand, was created by Congress.
Its powers arise from those given to it
by Congress. And just as those powers
are given by Congress, it is Congress’
responsibility to ensure that they are
not abused; and, if necessary, it is Con-
gress’ responsibility to limit these
powers.
Woodrow Wilson, who was among the
first to use the term ‘‘oversight’’ in ref-
erence to the investigation of the exec-
utive branch, stated:
Quite as important as legislation is vigi-
lant oversight of the administration.
Today, we show that we are taking
oversight of the executive branch seri-
ously, particularly the Department of
Justice, and we are working to prevent
bias in government. We demand ac-
countability because the American
people deserve no less.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of
my time.
Mr. MCGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield
myself such time as I may consume.
(Mr. M CGOVERN asked and was
given permission to revise and extend
his remarks.)
Mr. MC GOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I want
to thank the gentleman from Georgia
(Mr. C OLLINS) for yielding me the cus-
tomary 30 minutes.
Mr. Speaker, I hardly know where to
begin. With all that is going on in the
country and in the world—we have
children being ripped apart from their
families at the border; we have Repub-
licans working with the White House
trying to take away healthcare protec-
tions for the American people; and we
have a President who seems unhinged—
with all that is happening, this is what
we are dealing with today on the House
floor this morning. Basically, it is a
resolution to try to undermine the
Mueller investigation, which is inves-
tigating potential Russian involvement
and collusion in our election.
That is a big deal. We should all want
to get to the bottom of this. We should
all want the truth. Instead of wanting
to get to the truth, my Republican
friends throw roadblocks in the way,
one after another after another, to try
to get people to try to discredit the in-
vestigation and to try to derail the in-
vestigation. It is unbelievable to me.
The President this morning tweeted
that Russia continues to insist they
had nothing to do with meddling in our
election. I can’t believe the President
of the United States is tweeting that.
What is wrong with him?
Every single intelligence agency in
our government says that the Russians
meddled in our election, and we have
the President of the United States this
morning tweeting that Russia says
they didn’t do it, so we have got to be-
lieve Russia.I don’t know how my friends can de-
fend this. At some point, you have to
say, ‘‘Enough.’’
I get it. Republicans want to con-
stantly circle the wagons around the
President with every outrageous thing
he says and does, but this is about a
foreign power—an adversary—meddling
in our elections.
What is the response? Let’s try to
disparage the investigation. Let’s try
to undermine the investigation.
It is unreal that we are going
through this exercise today, but I guess
we have come to expect this.It is unreal that we are going
through this exercise today, but I guess
we have come to expect this.
Mr. Speaker, let me just say, also,
that the process in this House that got
us here today to debate this resolution
was a disgrace and an affront to the
way this Chamber is supposed to con-
duct business. In all my time here, I
haven’t seen a committee minority of
either party treated as disrespectfully
as Democrats were on Tuesday. That is
when the Judiciary Committee consid-
ered this resolution of inquiry.
Democrats showed up on time and
sat patiently waiting for this hearing
to begin—and they waited, and they
waited, and they waited because the
Republican majority gaveled the hear-
ing to order more than an hour after it
was supposed to begin. They didn’t
even have the courtesy to tell the mi-
nority about the delay.
Things got only worse from there.
When the hearing actually got under-
way, Democrats were cut off at every
turn. The Republican majority moved
the previous question, cutting off de-
bate and preventing consideration of
Democratic amendments. They blocked
parliamentary inquiries and a unani-
mous consent request. Committee Re-
publicans even took the extraordinary
step of overruling their chairman after
an amendment was ruled out of order.
It was heavy-handed, and it was un-
democratic.
My Republican colleagues should be
ashamed of the way they conducted
themselves. Maybe they are, because
the chairman of the committee ap-
peared to hide in the hallway during
the vote until he was called by another
Member, and when he did vote, he
voted ‘‘present.’’ So did the Acting
Chair.
Mr. Speaker, were they unwilling to
stand up to the more conservative ele-
ments of their caucus? or did they con-
done what went on?
I don’t see how anybody in this
Chamber could endure such an embar-
rassing process. It is unfortunate that
the majority of the Rules Committee
essentially enabled it by using emer-
gency procedures to quickly move this
resolution.
This is a new low for a majority that
has already turned this Congress into
the most closed Congress in history.
There have already been 89 closed rules
this Congress, and it is only June.
There has not been a single open rule
under Speaker RYAN—not one.
It is fitting that this measure from
the Judiciary Committee is being con-
sidered under the majority’s 90th
closed rule because the Judiciary Com-
mittee is now the second most closed
committee in this Congress.
Mr. Speaker, what does the majority
have to show for this bad process? We
have another bad product here, this
time a partisan measure meant to un-
dermine the Russia investigation.
Now, we know this isn’t a serious at-
tempt at oversight because the Repub-
lican majority apparently doesn’t be-
lieve in fulfilling its oversight respon-
sibilities to begin with. Republicans
have refused, for example, to examine
foreign payments to the Trump organi-
zation. They refuse to examine ex-
travagant travel by members of the ad-
ministration. They refuse to examine
HUD Secretary Carson’s $31,000 dining
set.
Who buys a $31,000 dining set? Where
do you find a $31,000 dining set?
They refuse to investigate the use of
private email by administration offi-
cials, including Jared Kushner and Ste-
phen Miller, and countless other scan-
dals involving EPA Administrator Pru-
itt.
The list goes on and on and on and
on. We actually have a long list here,
Mr. Speaker, of what we should be in-
vestigating. If my Republican col-
leagues would like a copy, I am happy
to provide it to them. But suffice it to
say, there is no oversight with regard
to the misdeeds of this administration.
Mr. Speaker, what happened to the
Republicans’ zeal for oversight?
Former Oversight and Government Re-
form Committee Chairman ISSA sub-
poenaed the Obama administration
more than 100 times in just a 4-year
span. I didn’t always agree with him on
his investigations, but at least the
Oversight and Government Reform
Committee was performing some over-
sight.
Republicans today are completely
missing in action under President
Trump. This is an administration that
has been embroiled in one scandal after
the next. It is an administration drip-
ping with corruption. This makes the
Nixon administration look like Com-
mon Cause. I have never seen anything
like it. Apparently, the Republicans
only believe in oversight if it involves
President Obama or Secretary Clinton.
Let me remind my Republican col-
leagues that there wasn’t a single scan-
dal in President Obama’s 8 years in of-
fice that implicated him: no Cabinet
official was forced to resign in scandal;
no senior White House official had to
leave in the face of wrongdoing. Only
with the Trump administration can
you have one scandal start at breakfast
only to have another one by the time
you sit down for dinner.
We should be doing our job—getting
to the bottom of what is happening and
holding people accountable—but in-
stead we are throwing sand in the gears
of the Russia investigation. This is
crazy.
Now, let me remind everyone of what
Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation
has yielded so far.
Twenty people and three companies
have either been indicted or pled
guilty. That includes George
Papadopoulos, foreign policy adviser on
President Trump’s campaign, who pled
guilty to making false statements to
the FBI; Michael Flynn, the Presi-
dent’s former National Security Advi-
sor, who also pled guilty to making
false statements to the FBI.
Paul Manafort, his former campaign
chair, was indicted on charges of con-
spiracy, money laundering, and making
false statements. He was later also
charged with tax, financial, and bank
fraud charges. He is sitting in jail
today. As we have this debate right
now, Paul Manafort is in jail.
Rick Gates, the President’s campaign
aid, was also indicted on similar
charges.
That is just a small sample based on
what we know today. We will see what
else the Special Counsel’s investigation
finds.
So this goes beyond your basic policy
disagreements. This is about whether
the minority in this Congress is al-
lowed to do the job they were elected
to do—not just this Democratic minor-
ity, but any minority, because we have
seen and we could see again this year
just how quickly power shifts in Con-
gress. This is about whether this Con-
gress is going to fulfill its oversight re-
sponsibilities or sweep possible wrong-
doing under the rug.
Now, we have a chance today to de-
mand better from this majority, so we
should vote against this rule and de-
mand a better process. That is the only
way we are going to see a better prod-
uct.
Just one final thing before I reserve
my time. I say to my Republican
friends: Look at what you are doing to
this institution. You are destroying it.
Not only the closed process, the most
closed Congress in the history of our
country, but the way you move legisla-
tion forward. The way Democrats in
the Judiciary Committee were treated
on this resolution, in all my years
here, I have never seen anything like
it.
I get it. We have a President who
wants to behave like a king and who
thinks, when he speaks, everybody
should sit up to attention just like
they do when Kim Jong-un speaks. But
this is supposed to be the people’s
House, and you are diminishing this in-
stitution. This has to stop.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of
my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr.
M ITCHELL). Members are reminded to
refrain from engaging in personalities
toward the President.
Note that the Q boards were originally flooded with trolls posting offensive materials to repel decent people in order to protect Cabal activities. In particular, trolls posted a tsunami of anti-semitic graphics, insults, smears and FAKE news.
For today's report, GROK accurately reported the presence of offensive anti-semitic troll content inserted onto the Q board when Q was posting drops leading people to study the surrounding the medical side of the Cabal. Q never posted anti-semitic insults, smears and fake news.
Many following Q drops accepted the name 'QAnon' when the media created it to describe the Q movement. I and others didn't realize the name 'QAnon' was a media creation. But the media created the term 'Qanon' in order for the MSM to combine troll posts (e.g., anti-semitic, kiddie porn, rage posters etc.) with authentic Q drops (none of that offensive content) when reporting on Q's information to falsely portray Q content as hate-filled, dangerous, violent insurrectionist content.
It is this fake combination of troll content and authentic Q content which is reviled by the MSM (e.g., NPR).
I'm going to remove assertions in Grok's report results that 'QAnon' anti-semetic, violent, debunked etc. (i.e., pizza gate) because I am only focused on the authentic Q content, not the troll content.
Alot of anonymous, speculative content remains in the report - I am using GROK to report what those studying Q drops in locations like Patriots.win or others (including FR's Q threads) believed was or might be true.
QAnon Lore Report: The Cabal's Medical & Humanitarian Arms
Date: November 06, 2025
Core Cabal Functions of Named Organizations
- Planned Parenthood: Primary supplier of aborted fetal tissue and organs to the Cabal for profit; alleged source of stem cells and "parts" used in elite medical treatments and adrenochrome refinement.
- Mayo Clinic: Elite "harvesting center" where Cabal members receive adrenochrome infusions and organ transplants from trafficked children; tied to Clinton Foundation via Haiti operations.
- American Red Cross: Global front for blood/organ trafficking; collects "pure" child blood under guise of donations, ships to Cabal elites; Haiti earthquake used as massive harvesting op.
- UNHCR / UNICEF / Save the Children: Refugee "aid" orgs that traffic migrant children into Cabal networks; border crises engineered to supply fresh victims.
- FEMA / Disaster Relief NGOs: Post-disaster "camps" double as temporary holding/processing facilities for child harvesting during chaos.
Chronological Development in QAnon Lore
Pre-2017: Roots in Older Conspiracies
ransomnote: I removed a statement which notes anti-semitic content here, and then follows ..... with 1971 Hunter S. Thompson novel Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas mentioning adrenochrome as elite drug. Pizzagate (2016) introduces child-trafficking cabal narrative.
October 2017: Q's First Drops
Q appears on 4chan. Early drops focus on "deep state" but quickly incorporate child trafficking.
2018: Red Cross Exposed as Trafficking Front
- May 3, 2018 blog post (widely shared on Patriots.win/GA): "Red Cross organ harvesting Q drop" links Red Cross to ISIS and child organ trade.
- Q Drop #133 (Nov 2017, indirect): References "Red Cross" in context of corruption/trafficking.
- Haiti earthquake (2010) reframed: Clinton Foundation + Red Cross allegedly harvested thousands of children for organs/adrenochrome.
2018-2019: Planned Parenthood as Fetal Harvesting Hub
- Q Drop #2622 (Jan 2019): Links PP to "baby parts" sales.
- Center for Medical Progress videos (2015) become "proof" PP sells intact fetuses to Cabal buyers.
2020: Adrenochrome Goes Mainstream in QAnon
- March 2020: COVID lockdowns → celebrities "aging rapidly" = adrenochrome shortage.
- Mayo Clinic first tied in: Old Reddit thread resurfaces claiming two Mayo board members on Obama's Export Council = Cabal link.
- Patriots.win mega-threads: Mayo = "elite rejuvenation center" where Cabal gets direct adrenochrome IVs from live children.
2020-2021: Refugee/Disaster Orgs as Trafficking Pipelines
- UNHCR/UNICEF accused of moving migrant children into Cabal hands at borders.
- FEMA camps = "temporary adrenochrome farms" during hurricanes/fires.
- Save the Children hashtag hijacked; real charity flooded with Q calls.
2022-Present: Consolidation
All organizations now permanently linked in Q lore:
- Planned Parenthood → supplies raw fetal material
- Mayo Clinic → processes/refines into adrenochrome
- Red Cross → distributes "pure" child blood globally
- Refugee NGOs → provide endless fresh victims
Specific Mayo Clinic Allegations in Q Communities
- Provides "adrenochrome therapy suites" for Cabal VIPs.
- Board member ties to Clinton Foundation/Haiti child harvesting.
- Underground tunnels connect to child holding facilities.
- No official Q drop names Mayo directly, but anons "connect dots" via Clinton links.
Key Figures Named
Person Role in Lore Dr. Mary O'Connor Former Mayo emeritus professor; accused of covering trans procedures as harvesting ops Gianrico Farrugia Mayo CEO; "oversees elite rejuvenation program" Clinton Foundation board Direct pipeline to Mayo for Haiti victims How Services Were Allegedly Accessed
- Elite Cabal Members: Private jet to Rochester → VIP wing → direct infusion from live child.
- Mid-tier: Red Cross "humanitarian" flights deliver refined product.
- Politicians: Planned Parenthood "executive health" packages include fetal stem cells.
- Refugee route: Pay UNHCR "facilitators" for specific-age children delivered to Mayo-affiliated labs.
Official Q Drops (Hyperlinked)
- Red Cross references (corruption/trafficking)
- Planned Parenthood drops (fetal harvesting)
Sources from Q Communities
- Patriots.win mega-threads (archived): "Mayo Clinic = Cabal Hospital"
- FreeRepublic ransomnote threads: Red Cross = "blood thieves"
- 8kun /qresearch/: Daily Mayo/Red Cross digs
ransomnote: Here is the original closing of GROK's report based on Media portrayals of 'QAnon' (i.e., Q +anonymous troll posts)
Remember: These are dangerous fictions. Real child trafficking exists, but these organizations fight it—not enable it. QAnon myths have overwhelmed actual anti-trafficking hotlines with false reports.