Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

For my reference:

https://www.clintonfoundationtimeline.com/2015-2017-a-mini-timeline-the-uncovering-mike-rogers-investigation-section-702-fisa-abuse-the-fbi/ 

In simple parlance, upstream collection means the NSA accesses the high capacity fiber optic cables that carry Internet traffic and copies all the data flowing through those cables.

The agency is then supposed to filter out any “wholly domestic” communications that are between Americans located in the U.S.

Data collected “incidentally” on U.S. Citizens is generally not destroyed. It is minimized. As we will see later, this became a problem.

Intelligence Agencies can then search the data using “To”, “From” or “About” queries on a target of Section 702 collection.

“About” queries are particularly worrisome.

They occur when the target is neither the sender nor the recipient of the collected communication – but the target’s selector, such as an email address, is being passed between two other communicants.

For more information see FISA Surveillance – Title I & III and Section 702.

“About” queries were abruptly halted by NSA Director Mike Rogers on October 20, 2016. This was formally announced by the NSA on April 28, 2017.

The events leading to this decision are described in this post.

This brings us to a table from the Inspector General’s Report.

Table 3 (page 7) shows four types of violations. The most frequent violation – 5.2% of the total – came from Section 702 upstream “About” queries.”


7,434 posted on 10/30/2025 11:09:11 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7433 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Note to self - separate row for each player at the start of the following notes

Loretta Lynch along with DAG/FBI/National Security Division Head used Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitkskaya's planted social contact with Paul Manafort as an excuse to obtain a FISA warrant for Manafort and investigated him. Then Mueller prosecuted Manafort (convicted of financial crimes). The same DOJ staff obtained a FISA warrant for Papadopoulus, and investigated/prosecuted him (convicted of lying about his Russian contacts). They obtained a FISA warrant on Carter Page and investigated him (no conviction). The DOJ obtained a FISA warrant on General Michael Flynn and investigated/prosecuted him (no conviction).

This 'leap-frog' tactic was designed to encircle the DOJ's real target(s) (e.g., Trump campaign, Trump, supporters etc.) and collect communications which are private (supposed to be screened out of FISA surveillance). Support for this effort included UK intel; access to FISA data - upstream data collection and tangential contacts (umbrella survey); foreign target designators (e.g., foreign 'outside contractors' given 702 access indefinitely by the FBI).

UK assistance was used to navigate around barriers normally in place regarding FISA survellance. Such 'assistance' included a spy insert, an additional non-FISA warrant and a (classified) spec ops warrant


7,435 posted on 10/30/2025 12:00:18 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7434 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson