Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote; All
Here's the bottom line from Italy a study with 300k taking part.

Eventually these studies will figure out it's not just cancers but many other issues from the shots. They include heart,lungs,most organs and many other issues. All happen from the shots. The more you have had the worse it gets.

That's my opinion from my research.

...............................

Here's the latest from the source:

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-first-population-wide-study?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=172353455&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2492wq&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

BREAKING:

First Population-Wide Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers

Official government data from nearly 300,000 people tracked for 30 months show mRNA shots significantly increase the risk of overall cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, and colorectal cancer.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Aug 30, 2025

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A groundbreaking new peer-reviewed study has just been published in EXCLI Journal. For the first time, researchers formally analyzed the long-term relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer hospitalizations in a population-wide cohort of nearly 300,000 residents of Pescara province, Italy.

The study followed every resident aged ≥11 years for 30 months (June 2021 through December 2023) using official National Health Service data. The main vaccines administered were Pfizer-BioNTech (Comirnaty) and Moderna (Spikevax) mRNA shots, with smaller proportions receiving AstraZeneca (Vaxzevria) and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) viral vector vaccines.

Importantly, the statistical models were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, COPD, kidney disease), prior cancer, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection — ensuring that infection status was explicitly taken into account. This makes it the longest and most comprehensive follow-up to date on cancer outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination.

The results are deeply concerning: while the study shows the expected biases that make vaccines look like they reduce overall death rates, it also uncovers the first statistically significant evidence of increased cancer risk following COVID-19 vaccination.

THE FIRST FORMAL SIGNAL: INCREASED CANCER RISK

Despite strong “healthy vaccinee bias” (explained below), the study still found multiple increases in cancer hospitalizations among vaccinated individuals.

Overall cancer risk:

+23% increased risk after ≥1 dose (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11–1.37) (statistically significant)

+9% increased risk after ≥3 doses (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.16) (statistically significant)

BY CANCER SITE (Hazard Ratios Converted to % Increased Risk)

Breast cancer

+54% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10–2.16) (statistically significant)

+36% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08–1.72) (statistically significant)

Bladder cancer

+62% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07–2.45) (statistically significant)

+43% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08–1.88) (statistically significant)

Colon-rectum cancer

+35% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01–1.80) (statistically significant)

+14% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96–1.36) (not statistically significant)

Hematological cancers (leukemia/lymphoma)

+31% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.96–1.79) (not statistically significant)

+7% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.89–1.29) (not statistically significant)

Uterine cancer

+77% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.76–4.13) (not statistically significant)

+20% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.73–1.96) (not statistically significant)

Ovarian cancer

+71% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.60–4.82) (not statistically significant)

+86% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.86, 95% CI 0.68–5.12) (not statistically significant)

Thyroid cancer

+58% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.84–2.99) (not statistically significant)

-3% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67–1.45) (not statistically significant)

Prostate cancer

+1% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68–1.49) (not statistically significant)

-3% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76–1.23) (not statistically significant)

Lung cancer

-10% with ≥1 dose (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.68–1.18) (not statistically significant)

-7% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79–1.11) (not statistically significant)

There is more but an accompanying study is significant as well.

It's below:'


51 posted on 09/01/2025 4:43:50 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free Because of the Brave!! ITS ALL A CONSPIRACY:UNTIL ITS NOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rodguy911
Red piller!
102 posted on 09/01/2025 9:51:12 AM PDT by Melian (🟠✴️ Reminder: Memes are made to make you think or laugh. Verify for yourself before reposting. ✴️🟠)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: rodguy911

A very good friend of mine has had to have three surgeries to remove tumors from his bladder. This time they’re doing targeted chemo afterwards. He got the shot with his wife, she had to have it because she’s a nurse.

-SB


195 posted on 09/01/2025 7:20:25 PM PDT by Snowybear (Do or do not, there is no try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson