Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 09/01/2025 Vol.511, Q Day 2866, LittleLinda wrote:
WHAT WE LEARNED from Schara v. Ascension: 16 Lessons to Know
The Transcript and Video Show Us How We Need to Change Our Thinking
https://therebelpatient.substack.com/p/what-we-learned-from-schara-v-ascension
________________________________________________
This post reminds me of the very last Q drop and 3 before it, 4966 and 4963, where “Ascension” is mentioned in both drops. I wonder if the Q team was referring to the hospital where Grace Schara was killed - Ascension NE Wisconsin-St. Elizabeth Hospital. I’ll try to research the Schara case further to see if there could be a link between the drops and this case.
I think you nailed it. Below, my post on Ascension Hospital system. The system was building a DNA databank for AI to use to make decisions. While the text for Ascension Hospital system was sanitized, the image with the article shows a DNA databank (a filing system with a double helix DNA image on the side of it) in the middle of the Hospital network which AI would access to drive decision making (meant to imply benevolence).
Grace was born with Down syndrome and the medical decisions which followed included drug overdose and an illegal do-not-rescusitate order. I suspect the Ascension DNA databank did not approve of Grace.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 06/13/2024 Vol.494, Q Day 2421, ransomnote wrote:
I didn't feel I could even guess at Q4966 for almost a year.
I believed that Q was saying DNA is information, and whomever possesses it has power over us (mankind), and then 'Ascension'.
Long afterwards (9/30/23), I searched Google for, 'Ascension DNA' and felt I had found an answer. The resulting Ascension post I made used Ascension webpage content linking its hospital systems to Google - together they are building a DNA databank whether you like it or not, and it will be used by AI to 'manage' patient care. These are the same people who forbid us Ivermectin and forced Remdesivir on us instead.
So, if they know your DNA, they can 'treat you' accordingly. Here's an excerpt from my prior post:
".....when I searched for Ascension hospitals DNA, I found the following article, which only uses 'DNA' in the diagram of the data system - essentially there would be a DNA databank to support the AI's 'predictive algorithms' for treating patients. That's my opinion based on reading the cautiously written article and comparing it with the diagram - they don't seem to want to say anything in text about the DNA usage."
Here's the diagram:
Ascension's content on that page is deceptively written. It's a DNA data bank but you can only discern that in the diagram. Ascension claims they, and google, will protect patient's privacy per HIPPA, but HIPPA expedites sharing of information throughout hospital systems without informing us. Supposedly Google can't view your data, except for a select few (who can share it based on 'need'), but Google lies for profit.
I don't believe it's just Ascension using this model. Ascension laughably assures patients their information won't be used for advertising purposes, as if that's patients' primary concern, while claiming the only time information will be shared is when it would benefit the patient - when in fact the whole DNA databank with AI administration is falsely posed as 'for the patients'.
~~~~END OF PRIOR POST
So when I hear there's been hacking and the system is down, I am not sure that is a black hat effort. The staff are aghast at problems treating patients, but the patients are likely safer without that black hat AI system 'treating them.'1,102 posted on 6/20/2024, 11:42:50 PM by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

That’s a dandy little nightmare to close out my day.

‘Course, I haven’t had much confidence in ANY institution since ‘64 or so and the past five or ten years finished off any glimmer I’d had left.

GGrandkids are safe I think. Their parents oddly enough have worse attitudes than I do. (One of the grand daughters went through every school in their town before she finally settled on the one her kids attend and I’m certain she’d pull ‘em out and homeschool ‘em all if she even had a bad dream about the place.....and her sisters/in-laws are doin’ exactly the same.)

Did I mention that all the ladies have asked me if I could help with Math/Science for the littles if they have to go to homeschool?

Big ol’ grin. In a damn second.

If my DNA is in the AI system, which could easily happen without my consent via biopsies/blood work, I’m in trouble.

Having had cancer for 15 years, I have been a money making machine for Big Medicine/Big Pharma. Now that I have reached the “pallative” care stage, I could be seen as expendable. In a cost analysis scenario, more money could be made with an early stage cancer patient than a worn out, used up cog in the wheel.

Having been in the hospital several times this year, my husband was pushed towards a DNR. My emergency room physicians were vaccine pushers.

Though I was experiencing seizure like activity and had limited brain function, MY TOTALLY FUNCTIONING SOUL verbally demanded to know if my bedside docs had taken the Clot shot.
When told “yes, they saved my life” by one doctor, spidy senses kicked in and my response was “I do not trust you, your ignorance is a safety issue, get away from me, I want another doctor.”

My family was embarrassed by my outbursts of this nature. The nurse stuck that stupid Covid swab up my nose (first and only time since 2020) and I fought like hell.

I don’t trust anyone in the industrial medical complex. The WOKE PHARMA terrorists that work in this field are DANGEROUS to conservative Christians.

I have no memory of much after because I think they sedated me on the sly. I pray they didn’t give me that stupid and deadly shot.

AI analysing our DNA has no place in an unChristian emergency medical situation. If they use it to place value on a human life, limit medical care, do cost analysis, override patient self advocacy, it is the tool of the devil.

I went back to my prior post to Little Linda about Ascension's use of a DNA database to see if I could glean more information from it.
I went through and hi-lighted a few areas I will mention, but the key take away is the diagram shows a blood sample in the DNA database. Red blood cells don't contain DNA, but white blood cells do. I think it's possible that anyone who has had a blood test in the past 10 years may have been submitted to the databank. They could in fact store a blood sample, or update their blood sample collection for a person post gene therapy. Note a medical drone is displayed in the lowest left corner - ready to fly samples anywhere?
I made a copy of the diagram and hi-lighted a few areas in purple below.
Top Left: Patient identification card in a file (was that the "vaccine" passport?)
Top 2nd left: Image of DNA next to blood sample. The Patient's ID and DNA/Blood sample are connected in the diagram by a tiny hard-to-see white line. UPDATE: To the left of the double helix DNA, I now notice a small section of a molecule in white (not hi-lighted in purple), which looks like a specific section of a gene.
Top center - communication lines indicating patient's DNA information stored in the cloud and distributed to other locations/users.
Middle (next row down) left side - it appears to be a diagram of the brain (???) paired with the patient's DNA profile, calling out a certain aspect of the DNA unique to this patient. Here's where AI failed me: I tried to determine what they were saying about that aspect but AI couldn't agree with itself. Closest match (from my layperson's limited knowledge) was the DNA saccharide Pyranose* (part of DNA backbone) but AI was conflicted. If the diagram shows a DNA backbone structural molecule, then are they saying DNA is 'broken' or that unique DNA is being accommodated by 'the science'?
Anywho...
Middle - right side: It looks like a pathologist is studying the impact of that 'certain aspect' of the patient's DNA by using it to cultivate cells (drug testing them, maybe? "vaccine" testing?).
Bottom row: I highlighted a swatch of the diagram to call out the fact that these are lines of communication which are hard to see but connect all the aspects in the diagram and then head out to other regions not shown.
Best to keep in mind those lines of communication can indicate 2 way information traffic - not just distribution of DNA to the world, but also information flowing into the medical record(s).
Overall notes not mentioned above: A patient wearing a heart monitor (but other types of monitors are possible- are we all expected to have 'safety' monitors one day?) which sends data into the system, the cloud, other destinations not in the diagram. On the right side of the diagram, a 3-D printer is 'printing' a synthetic heart based on computer modeling based on the patient's DNA. Lowest right side shows a physician wearing virtual reality goggles exploring an image of the patient's heart.
* (Pyranose) Contains six members, five carbon atoms and one oxygen atom.