Replies

“Multiple centers of power are essential to the preservation of freedom.” *
~~~
I stand to agree. On moral grounds, I can appreciate the defensive nature of it as well.

What is strange is that “multi-polar” sounds a little like permitting a union of nations, who are all sovereign, or are *for* sovereignty.

It is also, however, about defending against the impositions of the Unipolar USA... who leads the European West and NATO, and the world.

It also hinges on tossing off the power of the US and the Euro-West, who shackle other nations in its historic ability to injure them, or else to ring compliance out of them, with the use of SANCTIONS.

Backed by nations whose “sovereignty” is already at risk, or being threatened, they seem to find a purpose and relief in BRICS, I think,(?).

The US is fighting that premise as it is harmful to the petrol Dollar.

While the EU still holds TRILLIONS, in the Russian ruble, due to sanctions, these smaller nations see a current example of Unipolar behavior to reject.

The last I heard was months ago, a leaked report I suppose, because its been completely silent ever since, but the EU reportedly discussed using those trillions of Russian currency to fund the war in UKRAINE against Russia! Theft. They’re to broke to dare call it a loan.

Was that a leak, or propaganda, Idk. 🤷‍♀️ It does make a person think though, about understanding how sick other continents must be of US power and the standard petrol Dollar tying up both war and trade rights of sovereign nations, at will, (especially while at war). 🤔

Pretty brain pain considerations to learn, when neither sources nor governments can be trusted on information agendas, or if AI will be falsifying real transparency, and truth. Crazy.

But, I don’t think the multipolar movement can be stopped, short of destructive acts.

We’re seeing plenty of reasons for its development, all over the world.