My point is that the throat is smaller than the head, smaller than the chest, but also, as reported, the shot hit the larynx in the middle of the throat. Also, the general access to the target: much human movement in the environment and of course the shade of the tent canopy overhead.
My point also was that the spiritual force behind the assassination would have wanted to silence that voice so that the larynx was an important target - in order to emphasize a specific point... and it was accomplished with one shot. The shooter may not be a 'professional' but he appeared to have had professional training (his father?)
. . . . .
I heard some female on the air today accusing Charlie Kirk of being 'evil'. I can't comprehend how society has evolved to the point that speaking the Word of God can be labeled evil... how inviting those who disagree with you to sit and talk things out can be labeled as evil. Presumably closed minded bigotry is fair and open, not evil, because their point of view (which happens to correspond to 'my' point of view) is correct beyond challenging.
Obviously 'freedom of speech' is now defined as expressing things that 'I' agree with and anything different is "fascism"... 🤷
He hit his chest and the bullet splintered. I doubt the killer was planning much symbolism. Perhaps Satan was and got lucky. Hitting a rectangle of 30 sq inches from 200 yards isn’t that difficult and is only difficult if you have no familiarity with guns, are recoil shy and have no knowledge of ballistics and how things work.
I find no symbolism in murder