Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Melian

USAID and Soros-Backed NGO Sparked Nepal’s Youth Revolution

https://amuseonx.substack.com/p/usaid-and-soros-backed-ngo-sparked
***************************************************

The fall of Nepal’s government this month was not the sudden consequence of youthful anger alone. It was the inevitable result of years of corruption funded and facilitated by US tax dollars, laundered through USAID, and carried out by its chosen consultants like Deloitte and its NGO partners such as the Soros-backed Niti Foundation. What was marketed to the Nepali people as democratic strengthening was in reality a hollow project of manipulation, siphoning money into the hands of politically connected elites while corroding every institution it claimed to support. The irony is inescapable. The very programs meant to build democracy hastened its collapse.

President Donald Trump put it bluntly when he called the USAID deals “completely corrupt and a fraud.” His instincts were correct. USAID promised tens of millions to implement federalism and biodiversity projects, yet much of this aid was hidden from oversight and funneled through channels designed to avoid accountability. Deloitte and Niti Foundation embedded themselves in the machinery of government, not to strengthen transparency but to bend it toward their own designs. Instead of robust institutions, Nepal received shadow agreements, compromised officials, and a rising tide of cynicism. When the money dried up, and when CIA-linked influence waned, the hollow edifice collapsed. The result was the youth-driven “Nepo Kids” uprising.

The immediate spark came from social media. Videos on TikTok and posts on 𝕏 exposed the lavish lifestyles of Nepal’s political elite, particularly their children. These “Nepo Kids” flaunted luxury cars and foreign vacations in a country where per capita income is barely $1,400. The contrast was explosive. Ordinary Nepalis, already aware of corruption, now saw it mocked before their eyes in real time. Hashtags amplified their outrage. For a generation raised on smartphones, this became not only political evidence but also a call to arms.

The government responded with the arrogance of authoritarians. In a move that reeked of desperation, it ordered social media platforms to register under new censorship rules and, when they refused, it shut them down entirely. Facebook, 𝕏, YouTube, TikTok, WhatsApp, even LinkedIn went dark. Rather than suppress anger, the blackout ignited it. Students poured into the streets. The so-called “Gen Z protests” quickly transformed from rallies against censorship into an all-out uprising against an entire political order. Once police violence escalated, the protests turned into revolution.

Yet to understand why the protests had such force, one must look deeper at the corruption exposed months earlier. Investigative reporting revealed that USAID had secretly funneled $33 million into federalism projects through irregular agreements signed by the Finance Ministry without constitutional approval. USAID’s chosen partner was the Niti Foundation, an NGO seeded with money from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations. Niti operatives, presented as “consultants,” were embedded in government offices, quietly shaping policy with foreign influence. Officials who should have resisted these intrusions were compromised by conflicts of interest, as in the case of Balananda Poudel, who both chaired a constitutional commission and had ties to Niti.

When whistleblowers revealed these entanglements, the government tried to deny everything. The Ministry of Finance claimed no USAID money had gone to federalism. That lie was exposed by its own officials, who showed that hundreds of municipalities had already received US-funded support. Documents surfaced proving the secret agreements, the involvement of Deloitte as contractor, and the bypassing of Nepal’s constitutional bodies. The scandal was devastating. To young Nepalis, it confirmed what the “Nepo Kids” images dramatized: their leaders were liars who treated the nation as spoils for themselves and their foreign patrons.

The ruling coalition led by Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli presented itself as Marxist-Leninist, committed to equality. In practice, it was a corrupt patronage machine. This is why the uprising was not merely a flash in the pan. It was the reaction of a generation that had been told socialism would bring justice, only to watch foreign aid turn into a vehicle for nepotism. The “people’s government” became the face of hypocrisy, living in palaces, silencing dissent, and taking secret checks from abroad.

......The lesson for the US is sobering. When our aid is co-opted by globalist contractors and NGOs, it ceases to be help and becomes poison. When we lecture others about democracy while hiding the strings we pull, we destroy our credibility. And when we fund corruption abroad, we betray not only foreign citizens but also American taxpayers who never consented to bankroll foreign elites.


2,686 posted on 09/12/2025 9:03:24 AM PDT by Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn. (All along the watchtower fortune favors the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2607 | View Replies ]


To: Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.

Unfortunately, the fall of Nepal is also being attributed to another US sponsored colour revolution, pointing to Trump.

Theorizing that roughly two years ago, Nuland was there, demanding that India choose between China and the US.

Any msg to Nepal is considered a msg to India.

India reportedly carries great influence on Nepal.

Currently, it is thought that any msg to both Nepal and India, now includes China....due to the recent India-China agreement(s), inside the Shanghai conference.

Coincidentally, Potus just posted a written statement, by MODI, that was circulated yesterday, where Modi announces discussions on trade between the US & India are concluding; “trade with the US”; “for peace and prosperity of both our people”; and Modi declares he “looks forward to talks with POTUS”.

~~~

Implications are that following POTUS angry congratulatory/best wishes post to India and China while they met in Shanghai, we recall POTUS wrote best wishes, “...as they “”try to”...I-can’t-recall-the- phrase... [to stab him in the back, essentially].
Am I even close, there?

Then, Nepal happened.

Then, Modi aligns with the US this week on unspecified trade with the US.

See how this works?

Abroad, there must be less perspective of Soros and his powers, certainly as indicated by his past, and compared to American conservative opinion as to Soros’s current powers to mettle.

Since USAID is gutted of its foreign slush money, our new enemy has become more about the prevalence of “NGO’s”, a catch-all moniker for often unspecified organizations. But, less about Soros.

Crazy world of opinions, motives, and influence warfare!

Most of it is around oil and warhawking, and for using the USA, in war, or endangering her attack.

Q should be *universally* ready for what is coming that nothing can stop.😎

Things are reduced to leap of faith right now. Actually proving truth with evidence is somehow thwarted, leaving the world to simply to pick an argument and cross their fingers.


2,756 posted on 09/12/2025 3:08:25 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey. For Greater Glory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2686 | View Replies ]

To: Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.

Gain of Function Research is Alive and Thriving in the United States

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/09/15/gain-of-function-research-is-alive-and-thriving-in-the-united-states/#more-375985

Excerpt:

Recently, I came upon several articles about a new 14,000 square foot bioweapon lab opening in Ft. Collins, Colorado this month, September 2025. According to the Daily Mail, September 9, 2025 exclusive:

America’s frightening new bat lab: $12m taxpayer-funded NIH research facility in Colorado will import bats from Asia and infect them with deadly diseases .....

Most people that I have talked to think that gain of function research (GOF) has been banned. “But wait,” they ask, “Wasn’t GOF research banned by Presdident Trump last May?” “Didn’t the HHS debar Peter Daszack and Eco Health Allinace because or their role in bioengineering Covid in Wuhan?” “Didn’t Obama ban GOF research during his administration?” I will answer those questions shortly.

In December 2022, the Colorado Larimer County Planning Commission approved the new “bat lab” in Fort Collins after giving only one day notice to the public for opposition.[2] This shows me that we all should be running for local positions on city councils and planning boards if we want to take back control and have our voices heard.

One outraged citizen, Christine Bowman, who started a grass roots group to oppose the research lab, said,

“We need answers as to how Covid-19 was modified to transfer from human to human before I will be satisfied that it’s okay to raise diseased bats to study in my neighborhood. Now that we know that the COVID pandemic likely started from a lab leak in Wuhan, China, we are questioning the safety of continuing such research….After letting chronic wasting disease [CWD] leak from their labs at CSU, hundreds of thousands of the deer population were killed from the disease. They (CSU) do not have a good track record of ensuring the safety or containment of diseases.….” [3]

Children’s Health Defense published a report written by Michael Nevradakis about the ongoing biological research at CSU.[4] In the report, Francis Boyle,Ph.D., a bioweapons expert, stated:

“It is well known that Colorado State University has a long and ongoing history of specialization in weaponizing insects with biowarfare agents for delivery to human beings. This new lab will magnitudinally increase CSU’s offensive biowarfare capabilities, in gross violation of the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972 and my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that provides for life in prison.”

Colorado State University already conducts research involving viruses related to “chikungunya, dengue, malaria, Rift Valley fever, Zika virus, COVID-19, MERS, influenza [and] hantavirus disease.” The new facility will expand the research to viruses that have high mortality in humans: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, Ebola virus, Marburg virus, Nipah virus and Hendra virus.”[5]

.....Wasn’t Gain of Function Research Banned?

Now to set the record straight as to whether President Trump or President Obama banned gain-of-function (GOF) research. In short, neither President banned GOF. Let me start with the current administration.

President Trump’s executive order, signed on May 5, 2025, BANNED “FEDERAL FUNDING” for “dangerous gain-of-function research” in foreign countries like China and Iran and IMPOSED RESTRICTIONS on GOF in the United States. The order, titled “Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research,” HALTED “FEDERAL FUNDING” for such research in countries deemed to lack sufficient oversight and PAUSED “FEDERALLY FUNDED” RESEARCH involving infectious pathogens and toxins within the U.S. UNTIL a new, safer, and more transparent policy can be developed. This U.S. pause is temporary, lasting 120 days, during which the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the National Security Advisor are tasked with creating stricter oversight guidelines. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/improving-the-safety-and-security-of-biological-research/

Gain-of-function research CAN CONTINUE under PRIVATELY FUNDED ventures. FEDERAL FUNDING WILL RESUME FOR GOF once new safety restrictions are in place. COMPRENDO? In essence, it was all a “dog and pony show.”

I checked the White House and National Institutes of Health (NIH) websites for updates on the stricter guidelines for gain-of-function research mandated by President Trump’s May 5, 2025, executive order.

As of September 14, 2025, the White House Website contains the full text of the executive order titled “Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research” (dated May 5, 2025). However, no specific update or announcement confirming the completion of these strict guidelines is present on the White House website as of September 9, 2025. The guidelines should have been completed recently, but no public announcement or detailed policy document is available on the White House or NIH sites.[13] [14]

Honestly, I don’t care about strict guidelines; I want the dangerous gain of function research TOTALLY OUTLAWED/BANNED/GONE/FINITO.


3,511 posted on 09/15/2025 8:40:15 PM PDT by Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn. (All along the watchtower fortune favors the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2686 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson