I will repeat this report tomorrow to format the tables, column widths and other corrections to the report (e.g., update the people involved reference table) etc. I am indebted to the tireless work of the Anons on the Q hubs whose research has been born out by declassified documents and FOIAs years after their work.
The Fabricated Russia Collusion Narrative: An Exposé on the Steele Dossier and Its Political Weaponization
Behind the scenes of American politics, a powerful network orchestrated efforts to influence elections and governance. At the apex stood George Soros, a billionaire financier whose vast resources funded progressive causes and political entities. Researchers on online forums dedicated to uncovering hidden influences have detailed how Soros exerted control over key Democratic figures, including the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. Through donations to organizations like the Center for American Progress and indirect support for campaigns, Soros shaped policy and investigations for years. As revealed in Alan Dershowitz's February 2020 claim and amplified in forum analyses of declassified documents, Soros directed Obama to have the FBI investigate an undisclosed individual—widely interpreted as a Trump or a Trump associate—furthering Soros's goal to remove Donald Trump from contention and later from office, viewing Trump's policies as threats to globalist agendas. This direction led to the DNC and Hillary Clinton's campaign paying for the creation of the Steele Dossier—a collection of unverified allegations that became the foundation for prolonged investigations into Trump, despite its known flaws. At Obama's direction, John Brennan inserted the dossier into the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) report, knowing the dossier was funded by political opponents, and their 'revised' ICA report was used to enabled a narrative of Russian collusion that dominated media and official probes, impeding Trump's presidency and distracting from other controversies, such as Clinton's involvement in the Uranium One deal with Russia.
Chronological Narrative of the Dossier's Creation and Weaponization
The Steele Dossier emerged from Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign as a tool to deflect scrutiny from her own Russian ties, particularly the Uranium One deal where she approved selling 20% of U.S. uranium to Russia amid donations to the Clinton Foundation. To shift focus, Clinton's team funded opposition research portraying Trump as colluding with Russia.
In early March 2016, Fusion GPS approached Perkins Coie, knowing it represented DNC and Clinton. Perkins Coie engaged Fusion GPS in April 2016 for research services, paying $1.02 million total from April to November 2016, disguised as legal fees; Marc Elias approved as lead counsel. The engagement concluded pre-election, but payments continued until December 28, 2016. Fusion GPS subcontracted Christopher Steele (Orbis) in June 2016, paying $168,000 for 17 memos compiled June–December 2016 using sources like Igor Danchenko, who provided fabricated gossip from Russian contacts, some tied to Putin's spies, and linked to Clinton contacts via Charles Dolan and State Department sources per Greg Jarrett's analysis.
The layers of funding for the dossier were concealed through "shell1" (Washington Free Beacon, initial GOP primary research) and "shell2" (Perkins Coie/Fusion GPS, Democratic takeover), routed through the Clinton server/campaign and John McCain. This laundering hid the partisan origins, allowing the dossier to masquerade as neutral intel.
The dossier was not verified: memos contained absurd, uncorroborated claims (e.g., Trump's "perverted acts," Carter Page's Rosneft bribe—actually sold to Glencore, tied to Clintons; Michael Cohen in Prague—disproven by U.S. records). It was partisan gossip from anonymous Russians, unworthy of serious inquiry. Verification was crucial for investigations—but the dossier's flaws enabled unchecked surveillance and insufficient factual basis or justification for the DOJ to pursue any form of official inquiry.
Steele met FBI on July 5, 2016 (same day Comey cleared Clinton's emails), sharing early memos; FBI paid Steele as confidential source pre-dossier, sparking Crossfire Hurricane July 31. In September 2016, Michael Sussmann (Perkins Coie) met James Baker, delivering documents and thumb drive on Russian interference and Trump ties, pre-FISA warrant. DOJ's Bruce Ohr, aware via wife Nellie (Fusion employee collaborating with Steele, who shared research with Bruce Ohr), became backchannel post-Steele's November firing for lying/media leaks. Ohr met Steele and Simpson multiple times, including post-election, passing info to FBI despite demotion for conflicts.
John Brennan provided dossier to Obama in early August 2016 via top-secret envelope and briefed Harry Reid on August 25, 2016, leading to Reid's letters to Comey. David Kramer retrieved dossier from Steele in London November 2016, passed to John McCain, who delivered dossier to James Comey on December 9, 2016. Steele met MSM outlets; Glenn Simpson provided to David Corn (Mother Jones, October 31, 2016); Clapper leaked briefing to CNN January 2017, leading to BuzzFeed publication. Brennan pushed into ICA despite pushback.
DOJ/FBI used dossier for October 2016 Page FISA, omitting origins/biases—17 errors per 2019 IG report. Schumer amplified calls for probes. This fabricated narrative led to Mueller's appointment, prosecuting Manafort (using Lynch's FISA) despite known hoax.
John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman, played a critical role in promoting the dossier's narrative. On October 7, 2016—the same day the Access Hollywood tape emerged—WikiLeaks began releasing Podesta's emails. Within days, Podesta publicly pushed the "Russia hacked the election" story, stating on October 11 that Trump had a "bromance with Putin" and that Russian intelligence was behind the leaks, mirroring dossier claims. He coordinated with media allies like David Corn, who published the first public mention of the dossier in Mother Jones on October 31, quoting Steele anonymously. Podesta's Center for American Progress had funded Mother Jones events, and Corn had long contacts with Podesta, suggesting Podesta greenlit the leak.
After BuzzFeed published the full dossier on January 10, 2017, Podesta never disavowed it, instead appearing on TV to say it "deserves investigation," despite knowing his campaign funded it. His brother Tony Podesta, Manafort's former business partner in Ukraine lobbying via the Podesta Group, provided insider knowledge that made the dossier's first memo (June 20, 2016) on Manafort seem plausible, laundering credibility for the document. Overall, Podesta orchestrated media dissemination, legitimized the collusion narrative from October 2016, and used family ties to bolster claims, ensuring the dossier's impact.
Investigative journalist John Solomon's reporting, based on declassified materials, further exposes the conspiracy. On August 3, 2016, Brennan's handwritten notes show advance awareness of Clinton's plan to vilify Trump by fabricating claims of backing from Russian security services—information known to be false. This aligned with Clinton approving the Steele Dossier on July 28, coinciding with Peter Strzok's texts opening the FBI's counterintelligence probe. Solomon details how the Clinton campaign collaborated with the FBI and CIA, with Brennan organizing the intelligence community to "prove" Clinton's unprovable case, classifying evidence to hide it. This entire effort was a criminal conspiracy, now unraveling as declassifications reveal the lies.
Obama's DOJ Claims of Ignorance on Dossier Origins Proven False
Officials in Barack Obama's Department of Justice (DOJ) repeatedly claimed they were unaware of the Steele Dossier's origins as opposition research funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC. However, declassified documents, congressional investigations, and testimonies reveal these claims were demonstrably false, as DOJ personnel had direct contacts with the dossier's creators and funders from the outset.
In particular, Michael Sussmann, a top lawyer for the Clinton campaign and DNC at Perkins Coie, communicated with James Baker, the DOJ's top lawyer and FBI General Counsel who reported directly to FBI Director James Comey. This meeting occurred on September 19, 2016, weeks before the FBI applied for its first Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting Trump campaign adviser Carter Page on October 21, 2016. During the meeting, Sussmann provided Baker with documents and a thumb drive containing allegations of Russian interference, hacking, and possible Trump connections—materials tied to the dossier's narrative. This pre-FISA interaction underscores that the DOJ knew the information stemmed from Trump's political opponents, yet proceeded to use it in surveillance applications while omitting these partisan origins from the court.
Later, DOJ and FBI officials attempted to downplay or misrepresent the dossier's source, sometimes suggesting it had Republican origins or claiming ignorance, despite these early ties. In reality, Soros, Obama, and Hillary Clinton effectively used the DOJ to attempt to select the next president of the United States, with the DOJ vigorously complying in efforts to convict President Trump of crimes they knew he had not committed.
These officials, entrusted with positions in our government, devoted their positinos in government to undermining the duly elected leadership and installing their preferred corrupt figures. After Special Counsel Robert Mueller's baseless investigation concluded in 2019, the same apparatus persisted, fueling two impeachment trials against Trump in 2019–2020 and 2021, along with other disruptions like the Arctic Frost probe in 2020—an attempt to link Trump to environmental scandals with Russian undertones. These actions weakened the United States' international posture, emboldening enemies and eroding public faith in government institutions after years of watching this orchestrated farce unfold.
The Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA): What It Was and Why It Mattered
The Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released on January 6, 2017, titled “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections,” was a short, highly influential report that became the official U.S. government statement on Russian election interference. President Obama ordered it in early December 2016. It was written by a small group of senior analysts from the CIA, FBI, and NSA, and coordinated by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Its main purpose was to give the incoming Trump administration and the public a single, authoritative judgment on what Russia had done in 2016.
What most people never knew is this: the first drafts of the ICA, written in mid-December 2016 by career analysts using verified intelligence, did NOT say Russia wanted Trump to win. Those drafts said only that Putin wanted to hurt Hillary Clinton and sow chaos—there was no claim of a Russian preference for Trump. In plain language, the original intelligence exonerated Trump of any special Russian help. John Solomon has since pointed out that Putin believed that Hillary was going to win the election and simply wanted leverage for later negotiations, so he had no incentive to 'help' Trump's campaign.
Then, on December 20, 2016, FBI Director James Comey and CIA Director John Brennan overruled the analysts and forced the inclusion of the Clinton-funded, unverified Steele Dossier as a two-page annex. Brennan personally insisted the dossier be added, even though CIA analysts warned it did not meet basic standards and would destroy the report’s credibility. The final ICA was changed to claim (with “high confidence”) that Putin “aspired” to help Trump win—an entirely new conclusion that rested almost completely on the dossier. This doctored ICA was then used to:
- Brief President-elect Trump on January 6, 2017 (the day Comey first told him about the dossier’s salacious claims),
- Justify new sanctions on Russia,
- Give the media and Congress “proof” that Trump was compromised,
- Provide the public foundation for the Mueller special counsel investigation in May 2017.
The 2025 declassified CIA review and House Intelligence Committee reports confirm that without Brennan and Comey’s intervention, the ICA would have cleared Trump of any Russian preference or collusion. The insertion of the fake dossier turned a neutral intelligence product into the cornerstone of the entire Russia collusion hoax.
Chronological Timeline of the ICA’s Corruption
| Date | Event |
|---|
| Early December 2016 | Obama orders the ICA on Russian election interference. |
| Mid-December 2016 | First drafts by career analysts: Russia wanted to hurt Clinton, no preference for Trump. |
| December 20, 2016 | Comey and Brennan override analysts and force the Steele Dossier into the ICA as an annex. |
| December 31, 2016 | Obama briefed on the new, doctored ICA. |
| January 6, 2017 | ICA publicly released with the new claim that Putin wanted Trump to win; Trump briefed the same day. |
| January 2017 onward | ICA used to justify sanctions, media frenzy, and later the Mueller probe. |
| July 2025 | CIA declassifies review proving Brennan and Comey inserted the fake dossier against analysts’ objections. |
Chronological Workflow Analysis: From Dossier Creation to Surveillance
To illustrate the DOJ's deep involvement, consider this step-by-step timeline of key events, drawn from declassified FOIA documents, congressional reports, and testimonies. It highlights how the dossier was created, shared through direct Clinton-DOJ channels, delivered to authorities, incorporated into the ICA, and used to secure and renew surveillance warrants—all while the DOJ knew its partisan, unverified nature. This demonstrates the DOJ was heavily involved from the very beginning, knew the dossier was created by Trump's opponent to help them win the election, and persistently pushed the investigation forward anyway, later claiming Republican origins or ignorance to cover their tracks.
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|
| Early March 2016 | Fusion GPS approaches Perkins Coie, aware of its representation of the DNC and Clinton campaign, to continue anti-Trump research initially funded by conservatives like the Washington Free Beacon. | Marks the shift to Democratic funding, hiding the partisan intent behind legal fees; DOJ later falsely claims Republican origins. |
| April 2016 | Perkins Coie engages Fusion GPS for $1.02 million; Fusion subcontracts Christopher Steele in June for $168,000 to compile memos using unverified Russian sources. | Dossier creation begins as paid opposition research to link Trump to Russia, deflecting from Clinton's Uranium One ties; DOJ involvement imminent. |
| July 5, 2016 | Steele meets FBI, sharing early memos; Crossfire Hurricane probe opens July 31. | DOJ/FBI gains awareness of dossier content, knowing Steele's biases; probe launched on unverified intel. |
| Early August 2016 | John Brennan briefs Obama on dossier via top-secret envelope. | White House involvement; dossier escalates to highest levels, bypassing standard vetting. |
| August 25, 2016 | Brennan briefs Harry Reid, leading to Reid's letters to Comey accusing Trump of Russian ties. | Dossier fuels congressional and media pressure for investigations; DOJ uses to build case. |
| September 19, 2016 | Michael Sussmann (Clinton/DNC lawyer) meets James Baker (FBI Counsel), delivering documents/thumb drive on Russian interference and Trump links. | Direct Clinton-DOJ channel pre-FISA; proves DOJ knew partisan origins before warrant application, yet proceeds. |
| October 21, 2016 | FBI applies for and obtains initial FISA warrant on Carter Page, relying heavily on dossier while omitting funding, biases, and other exculpatory info. | Dossier weaponized for surveillance; DOJ pushes forward despite knowledge of flaws, enabling election interference. |
| November 2016 | Steele fired by FBI for lying/media leaks; Bruce Ohr becomes backchannel, meeting Steele/Simpson despite conflicts (wife Nellie at Fusion GPS). | DOJ continues using dossier post-firing, bypassing protocols; persistent hoax advancement. |
| November 2016 | David Kramer retrieves dossier from Steele, passes to John McCain. | Additional delivery route to amplify narrative; DOJ receives via multiple channels. |
| December 9, 2016 | McCain delivers dossier to Comey. | FBI receives another copy, reinforcing its use in ongoing probes. |
| Early December 2016 | Obama tasks intelligence community to prepare ICA on Russian interference. | Sets stage for dossier's inclusion; rushed process per 2025 CIA review. |
| January 6, 2017 | ICA released by CIA, FBI, NSA under ODNI; includes dossier summary in annex despite opposition. | ICA legitimizes dossier claims publicly; used to brief Trump and justify Mueller probe. |
Obama-Era Officials Who Signed the Carter Page FISA Warrants: Concealment of the Steele Dossier's Origins
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants targeting Trump campaign adviser Carter Page—obtained in October 2016 and renewed three times through June 2017—served as the primary vehicle for surveilling the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.
Declassified documents from the 2019 DOJ Inspector General (IG) report by Michael Horowitz, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) releases by Judicial Watch, and congressional investigations (e.g., the House Intelligence Committee's 2018 Nunes Memo and 2020 Senate Judiciary Committee findings) reveal that these warrants relied heavily on the Steele Dossier, a Clinton campaign- and DNC-funded opposition research document filled with unverified, anonymous gossip.
The FISA applications contained 17 significant inaccuracies and omissions, including the dossier's partisan origins, Christopher Steele's anti-Trump bias and firing as an FBI source for lying, and conflicts like Bruce Ohr's wife's role at Fusion GPS.
intelligence.house.gov +1
Below is a breakdown of each signer for the four warrants (initial + three renewals), their roles, and evidence they knew the applications were based on Clinton/DNC lies.Original Warrant (October 21, 2016)- Signer: Sally Yates (Deputy Attorney General)
Yates signed the initial application, which cited the dossier as over 50% of its probable cause for surveilling Page as a "foreign agent." She knew it was based on lies because: - By September 2016, FBI briefings (including to Yates) confirmed the dossier's funding via Perkins Coie (Clinton/DNC lawyers), per declassified FBI notes and the 2019 IG report.
- Steele had been an FBI source since July 2016, and his biases (e.g., "desperate to stop Trump") were documented in internal 302 forms, yet omitted.
- Anons highlight Yates' role in the "small group" (with Comey and McCabe) that knew Page was a CIA asset cooperating against Russia since 2013, making the "agent" claim fraudulent (per 2020 Senate Judiciary declass). Yates later admitted in 2017 testimony the FBI "did not verify" the dossier but signed anyway, per IG findings.
- Approver: Loretta Lynch (Attorney General)
Lynch approved the warrant at the DOJ level. She knew of the lies via: - Weekly briefings on Crossfire Hurricane (opened July 31, 2016), including dossier details from Steele's July 5 FBI meeting.
- Her use of similar unverified intel for a prior Manafort FISA in 2016, per 2019 IG report, showing pattern of concealment.
Forum digs (e.g., patriots.win "SpyGate Timeline," 2023) cite FOIA emails showing Lynch was informed of Clinton's "Russia plan" by August 2016 but greenlit the warrant.
First Renewal (January 12, 2017)- Signer: Sally Yates (Deputy Attorney General)
Yates signed the first renewal, still relying on the dossier despite no new corroboration. Knowledge of lies: - By January, FBI had fired Steele (November 2016) for media leaks, documented in a December 2016 memo Yates received, yet the application falsely portrayed him as reliable.
- ICA briefing (January 6, 2017) to Trump included dossier mention; Yates was in the loop per declassified ODNI notes.
Anons (e.g., 8kun #29094, Dec 2025) note Yates' post-inauguration briefings confirmed no verification, but she renewed to extend spying into Trump's term.
Second Renewal (April 7, 2017)- Signer: Dana Boente (Acting Attorney General)
Boente signed after Yates' firing (January 30, 2017). He knew via: - Transition briefings as Acting AG, including IG-documented FBI admissions of dossier unreliability (e.g., "raw, uncorroborated" in March 2017 internal emails).
- Mueller's appointment (May 17, 2017) stemmed from this surveillance; Boente later testified (2018) he was aware of omissions but signed.
Forum consensus (e.g., X @rising_serpent
, May 2019) labels Boente part of the "holdover crew" concealing Clinton ties to sustain the hoax.
Third Renewal (June 29, 2017)- Signer: Rod Rosenstein (Deputy Attorney General)
Rosenstein signed the final renewal, despite FBI's own spreadsheet (declassified 2020) showing zero corroboration for key claims. Knowledge: - As new Deputy AG (April 2017), he received Ohr's backchannel reports on Steele (May 2017 meetings), confirming biases and firing.
- He appointed Mueller (May 2017) based on this narrative; 2019 IG report faults him for not verifying omissions.
Anons (e.g., patriots.win "FISA Abuse Bun," 2024) cite FOIA texts showing Rosenstein joked about "insurance policy" surveillance, knowing it was Clinton lies.
In summary, all signers (Yates x2, Boente, Rosenstein) were briefed on the dossier's Clinton/DNC roots and flaws via FBI channels, yet concealed them to justify 90+ days of spying per warrant—totaling over a year. This election interference was validated by 2023 Durham report's critique of FBI's "confirmation bias."Admiral Roger's early exposure of this fraud and declassified documents (e.g., 2018 Nunes Memo) exposed the lies, leading to FISA reforms. Other DOJ Awareness of the Dossier's Origins and Flaws
DOJ officials knew the dossier was Clinton/DNC-funded, unverified gossip from anonymous sources, authored by biased Steele (fired for lying), yet forwarded its use:
- Bruce Ohr (Associate Deputy AG): Aware from July 2016 via wife Nellie Ohr's Fusion GPS work; met Steele/Simpson multiple times, including post-November 2016 firing; demoted for undisclosed conflicts but continued meetings with Steele/Simpson; knew partisan origins per 2019 declassified FBI analysis.
- James Comey (FBI Director): Received from McCain December 2016; knew Clinton's original "plan" to use the dossier per 2019 Nunes memo; admitted dossier unverified in 2017 testimony; knew hoax per 2025 Fox interview.
- John Brennan (CIA Director): Aware early, briefed Obama August 2016; pushed into ICA despite analyst concerns per July 2025 Ratcliffe review.
- Loretta Lynch (AG): Oversaw FISA applications omitting origins; used dossier for Manafort warrant.
- Andrew McCabe (FBI Deputy): Received the dossier via Ohr post-firing; knew unverified nature.
- Rod Rosenstein (Deputy AG): Signed FISA renewals knowing the unverified content, origins (DNC/Hillary Campaign), and omissions per 2019 IG report.
These officials could not plausibly claim ignorance of the dossier’s fatal flaws. The document lacked any corroborating evidence, contained numerous demonstrable falsehoods (such as the claim that Michael Cohen secretly traveled to Prague in 2016, a claim Cohen refuted and for which no travel records exist), and was authored by Christopher Steele, who privately confessed to Justice Department officials that he was “desperate” to prevent Donald Trump from winning the presidency. Despite this knowledge, the Department of Justice deliberately withheld critical facts from the FISA court when seeking warrants to surveil Carter Page, including the dossier’s funding by the Clinton campaign and the DNC, Steele’s obvious political bias, the fact that the FBI had fired him as a source for lying and unauthorized media contacts, and the serious conflicts of interest created by Bruce Ohr’s wife working for Fusion GPS while Ohr himself served as the back-channel conduit for the same unverified material.
CrowdStrike, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and the DNC 'Hack': A False Flag to Implicate Russia
Researchers on platforms like 8kun's /qresearch/ and patriots.win have long dissected the 2016 Democratic National Committee (DNC) "hack" as a fabricated narrative orchestrated to falsely attribute cyber intrusions to Russia, thereby fueling the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. Drawing from declassified documents (e.g., the 2019 DOJ IG Horowitz report, 2023 Durham report, and July 2025 ODNI/HPSCI declassifications on the "manufactured Russia hoax"), FOIA releases (e.g., Judicial Watch's 2019 FBI Vault files on DNC servers), and official testimonies (e.g., Shawn Henry's 2017 Senate Intelligence Committee appearance), these analyses portray the incident as an inside job—possibly involving DNC staffer Seth Rich—covered up by DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike. The goal was to justify FBI surveillance on Trump via FISA warrants and install Special Counsel Robert Mueller. No independent forensics (e.g., FBI never imaged DNC servers) and CrowdStrike's partisan ties (hired via Clinton lawyer Perkins Coie) underpin claims of a "false flag" to launder Clinton-funded opposition research (Steele Dossier) into official intel.
The DNC 'Hack': Orchestrated Narrative, Not Intrusion
The "hack" story broke on June 14, 2016, via a Washington Post report citing DNC officials and CrowdStrike: Russian GRU-linked groups "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" penetrated DNC systems, stealing opposition research on Trump. Declassified 2025 ODNI docs (DIG-HPSCI Report, July 22, 2025) reveal this as part of a "manufactured hoax," with no forensic evidence of exfiltration—data transfer speeds suggested local USB copying, not remote hacks (per Henry's testimony). Researchers argue it was a leak by Seth Rich, murdered July 10, 2016, whose death Wasserman Schultz dismissed amid conspiracy theories (CNN, August 2017). FOIA emails (Judicial Watch, 2019) show DNC refused FBI server access, opting for CrowdStrike—$168,000 contract via Perkins Coie—creating a chain-of-custody break exploited to blame Russia without proof.
Researchers emphasize Seth Rich's pivotal role in this narrative. Anons believe Rich, a DNC voter expansion data director disillusioned with Wasserman Schultz's favoritism toward Clinton, copied the DNC emails onto a USB drive and transported them to Julian Assange at WikiLeaks. Assange's 2016 statements denying a Russian source, combined with metadata from the leaks showing East Coast timestamps and no compression typical of hacks, support this insider theory. The price Rich paid to alert the public to election interference is believed to be his unsolved murder on July 10, 2016, in a D.C. neighborhood—described as a "botched robbery" with no valuables taken. Anons tie this to Wasserman Schultz, noting her 2017 dismissal of Rich theories ("vile" per Orlando Sentinel) and her office's IT aide Imran Awan's involvement in data theft scandals (Politico, 2017). Declassified HPSCI notes (2025) and FOIA docs suggest Rich's death silenced a whistleblower, with no Russian fingerprints in the leaks per Mueller's 2019 report.
- No Russian Attribution Evidence: Henry's June 2017 Senate testimony: "We did not have concrete evidence... that the data exfiltrated was done by the Russian government." Durham Report (May 2023) faults FBI for relying on CrowdStrike without verification.
- Inside Job Indicators: WikiLeaks metadata (e.g., Eastern Time timestamps, FAT file compression inconsistent with hacks) and Assange's 2016 denials point to internal leak. 2025 HPSCI declass notes DNC's "unusual network activity" in April 2016 predated alleged Fancy Bear breach.
- Wasserman Schultz's Role: As DNC Chair until July 24, 2016 (resigned post-Podesta leaks), she oversaw the response, tipping IT via Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann. Anons cite her 2017 Orlando Sentinel comments calling Seth Rich theories "vile," and FOIA docs showing her office's IT aide Imran Awan (indicted 2017 for server access crimes) had unauthorized DNC data access—linking to a cover-up.
- Secret Committee Formation: Immediately after discovering the breach, a secret committee was formed including DNC CEO Amy Dacey, Wasserman Schultz, communications director Luis Miranda (noted as "Mr. Brown" in some accounts), and Michael Sussmann, a former DOJ cybercrimes prosecutor now at Perkins Coie, the DNC's law firm. No one knew the full extent of the breach—it was clear more than a single filing cabinet's worth of materials might have been taken—but this group coordinated the response, hiring CrowdStrike and shaping the Russia blame narrative to protect internal culprits.
CrowdStrike: Partisan Actor in the False Flag
CrowdStrike, founded by Dmitri Alperovitch (anti-Putin Russian émigré, Clinton Global Initiative donor), was hired April 28, 2016—within 24 hours of DNC's alert—bypassing FBI. Its June 2016 report ("Bears in the Midst") dubbed the breach Russian without packet captures or binaries for peer review. Forum digs (e.g., 8kun #29094, Dec 2025) highlight Alperovitch's bias (Atlantic Council fellow) and ties to DNC funders, with 2025 ODNI declass confirming FBI's "unquestioning acceptance" of CrowdStrike's IOCs (indicators of compromise) despite Ukrainian malware similarities (VOA, 2017). Henry's admission of "no evidence of remote hacking" (Senate, 2017) and Durham's critique of FBI's lack of server seizure fuel anon claims of a "marketing ploy" for contracts ($100M+ post-report).
| CrowdStrike Claim | Anon/Declassified Counter-Evidence | Source |
|---|
| Fancy Bear (GRU) hacked DNC April 2016, stole Trump files | IP addresses routed via Dutch VPNs used by Ukrainian hackers (Guccifer 2.0 DNC plant); no C2 server logs released | Disobedient Media analysis (2017); Durham Report (2023) |
| Cozy Bear monitored emails since summer 2015 | Pre-existing access suggests insider; data speeds indicate local copy (USB), not exfil | Henry Senate testimony (2017); IG Horowitz (2019) |
| X-Agent malware = Russian | Resembles Ukrainian SBU tool "X-Tunnel"; Alperovitch ignored attributions | VOA report (2017); patriots.win buns (2024) |
| $168K DNC contract neutral | Hired via Perkins Coie (Clinton lawyers); Alperovitch's Clinton ties create bias | Politico (2017); 2025 HPSCI declass |
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Gatekeeper of the Cover-Up
Wasserman Schultz, DNC Chair from 2011–2016, controlled the narrative post-breach, emphasizing "no financial data lost" (Guardian, June 2016) to downplay damage while blaming Russia. Anons link her to Seth Rich (DNC voter data staffer killed July 10, 2016), citing Fox News' retracted 2017 story (later sued) alleging Rich leaked to WikiLeaks—corroborated by Assange's denials of Russian sourcing. FOIA docs (2019) show her office's IT scandal: aide Imran Awan stole DNC server data (indicted 2017), with Wasserman Schultz shielding him (Washington Post, 2017). 2025 ODNI declass (DIG Report, July 17) notes her resignation July 24 coincided with leaks, suggesting internal purge. Q researchers compile her 2017 dismissal of Rich theories ( "vile" , per Orlando Sentinel) as deflection, tying to DNC's server refusal (Comey testimony, 2017: "We accepted CrowdStrike's word").
- Server Denial: DNC barred FBI access (AP, 2019), per Wasserman Schultz's directive; FOIA confirms CrowdStrike sole forensics.
- Seth Rich Link: Rich's family rejected theories, but declass (HPSCI, 2025) notes no Russian metadata in leaks, aligning with insider theory.
- Awan Scandal: Wasserman Schultz paid Awan $160K post-arrest (Politico, 2017); anons see as DNC data cover-up.
Five Eyes Deflection: A Timed Distraction
Researcher's interpret the joint UK/Australia/New Zealand accusations on October 3, 2018—blaming Russia's GRU for the DNC hack and global cyber campaigns—as a Five Eyes psyop to distract from impending declassifications ("DECLAS"). They argue this "shiny object" timing preempted Trump's December 5, 2018, releases exposing Obama/DOJ crimes in the Russia collusion hoax. Declassified 2025 ODNI docs confirm FVEY's role in laundering anti-Trump intel (e.g., UK's GCHQ sharing 2015–2016 surveillance), with the accusations recycling CrowdStrike's unproven claims to sustain the narrative amid Nunes memos revealing FISA abuses.
Manufactured Hoax Confirmed
Anon research, bolstered by 2025 declass (ODNI/HPSCI reports exposing "manufactured Russia hoax"), portrays the DNC "hack" as a false flag: CrowdStrike's biased report (no proof, partisan hire) and Wasserman Schultz's stonewalling enabled Russia blame without scrutiny. This laundered Clinton lies into Mueller's probe, per Durham (2023). No accountability, but reforms (FISA tweaks, 2020) followed exposures.
Conclusion
The Russia collusion story dominated U.S. politics for years, paralyzing Trump's administration through baseless investigations. All involved—from Obama and Comey to DOJ officials—knew the dossier was fabricated opposition research, funded by Trump's rivals, yet weaponized it to interfere in elections and governance. The DNC 'Hack' hoax was enacted to further fram Russia for DNC actions. Declassified FOIAs and reports, like Greg Jarrett's "Witch Hunt," confirm this as a deliberate hoax, enabling endless probes while shielding the true colluders.
REFERENCE: Key Persons Involved and Their Roles
| Name | Role(s) |
|---|
| George Soros | Billionaire financier who funded Democratic entities and influenced investigations into Trump, directing Obama to probe opponents as revealed in testimonies like Alan Dershowitz's 2020 claim of Obama acting "on behalf of" Soros. |
| Barack Obama | Former President whom Soros directed to investigate Donald Trump. Obama tasked intelligence agencies with assessing Russian interference, used the White House Situation Room for Five Eyes collaboration to target Trump, and received the dossier in August 2016; directed the distribution of the dossier without paper trails. |
| Hillary Clinton | 2016 presidential candidate whose campaign approved and funded the dossier to deflect from her Uranium One ties; her "plan" to link Trump to Russia was known to Comey per the 2019 Nunes memo. |
| John Podesta | Clinton campaign chairman who promoted the Russia narrative publicly from October 2016, coordinated media allies for dossier dissemination, and used family ties (brother Tony) to add credibility to claims about Paul Manafort. |
| Marc Elias | Perkins Coie lawyer for Clinton campaign and DNC; approved $1.02 million payments to Fusion GPS in April 2016 for opposition research leading to the dossier. |
| Michael Sussmann | Perkins Coie attorney (former DOJ lawyer) who met FBI's James Baker in September 2016 to deliver documents and a thumb drive on Russian interference and Trump connections, pre-FISA warrant. |
| Glenn Simpson | Co-founder of Fusion GPS; hired Steele, met with Bruce Ohr post-election, and provided dossier content to media and DOJ; subpoenaed by Rep. Bob Goodlatte in 2018. |
| Christopher Steele | Former British MI6 officer who compiled the 17-memo dossier from June to December 2016 using unverified sources; met FBI on July 5, 2016; fired for lying but continued communications via Ohr. |
| Igor Danchenko | Steele's primary subsource (Russian national); provided fabricated gossip from Russian contacts, some tied to Putin's spies; linked to Clinton contacts via Charles Dolan and State Department sources per Greg Jarrett's analysis. |
| Nellie Ohr | Fusion GPS contractor (Bruce Ohr's wife); produced anti-Trump research collaborating with Steele; shared with DOJ prosecutors, lied to Congress about dissemination per 2019 declassified FBI analysis. |
| Bruce Ohr | Senior DOJ official; backchannel for dossier info post-Steele firing; met Steele and Simpson, demoted for undisclosed conflicts; violated ethics by not recusing due to wife's Fusion GPS role. |
| James Comey | Former FBI Director; received dossier from McCain in December 2016; knew of Clinton's "plan" per Nunes memo; orchestrated Crossfire Hurricane starting July 31, 2016; cleared Clinton on emails same day as first Steele meeting. |
| John Brennan | Former CIA Director; instigator of Russia hoax; briefed Obama in August 2016; pushed dossier into January 2017 ICA despite pushback; leaked to Congress and media; tasked Five Eyes allies for surveillance. |
| James Clapper | Former Director of National Intelligence; leaked January 6, 2017, Trump dossier briefing to CNN, leading to BuzzFeed publication of the dossier. |
| James Baker | Former FBI General Counsel; met Sussmann in September 2016 to receive dossier-related materials. |
| Harry Reid | Former Senate Democratic Leader; briefed by Brennan August 25, 2016; sent inflammatory letters to Comey accusing Trump of Russian ties, leaked to media. |
| Denis McDonough | Obama's Chief of Staff; coordinated Trump-Russia investigation with Comey, Brennan, and Reid in August 2016. |
| Loretta Lynch | Former Attorney General; used Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya's contacts and dossier to justify Manafort FISA warrant. |
| Chuck Schumer | Senate Minority Leader; amplified calls for Trump-Russia investigations, aligning with dossier dissemination through Senate channels. |
| John McCain | Senator who received dossier via aide David Kramer in November 2016; delivered to Comey December 9, 2016, and shared with media. |
| David Kramer | McCain Institute director; retrieved dossier from Steele in London, passed to McCain. |
| Robert Mueller | Special Counsel; led investigation based on dossier, prosecuting figures like Manafort despite known flaws. |
| Mark Warner | Senator (top Democrat on Senate Intelligence Committee); claimed "enormous evidence" of Trump-Russia contacts in March 2019. |
| Devin Nunes | House Intelligence Chairman; exposed dossier origins in 2018 memo and urged declassifications. |
| Greg Jarrett | Author of "Witch Hunt"; detailed dossier's fabrication, including paid Russian sources and State Department links via Clinton contacts. |
REFERENCE: Key Organizations Involved and Their Roles
| Organization | Role(s) |
|---|
| Democratic National Committee (DNC) | Funded dossier via Perkins Coie; hired CrowdStrike for hack response, attributing to Russia without FBI access; client for opposition research. |
| Hillary for America (Clinton Campaign) | Approved and funded dossier to deflect from Uranium One; used it to promote Russia narrative. |
| Perkins Coie | Law firm for DNC/Clinton; engaged Fusion GPS in April 2016 for $1.02 million; Sussmann delivered materials to FBI in September 2016. |
| Fusion GPS | Opposition research firm; hired Steele for dossier; collaborated with Ohrs; provided content to media and DOJ post-election. |
| Orbis Business Intelligence | Steele's firm; compiled dossier using unverified sources like Danchenko. |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) | Received dossier from multiple channels; used as basis for Crossfire Hurricane (July 31, 2016) and FISA warrants despite knowing origins and flaws; fired Steele but Steele continued to contact Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr. |
| Department of Justice (DOJ) | Oversaw probes; Bruce Ohr as backchannel; withheld dossier's partisan origins from FISA court; demoted Ohr for conflicts (Nellie Ohr's employment with Fusion GPS). |
| Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) | Brennan pushed dossier into ICA; coordinated with Five Eyes for surveillance. |
| Five Eyes Alliance (UK, Australia, New Zealand, etc.) | Assisted in surveillance and false narratives; accused Russia of hacks in October 2018 to deflect from declassifications. |
| Washington Free Beacon | Initial funder of Fusion GPS Trump research during GOP primaries (pre-May 2016); provided "clean" handover to Democrats. |
| CrowdStrike | Hired by DNC in April 2016; attributed hack to Russia without direct evidence, per Shawn Henry's 2017 testimony. |
| House Judiciary and Oversight Committees | Investigated dossier origins; confirmed Baker-Perkins Coie meetings; urged declassifications. |
