Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JayGalt
Just because an idea is defensible does not make it sound.

Just because money has been allocated, does not mean that it isn't "good money after bad." Trump has clawed back such grants before. This award is at his discretion.

34 posted on 08/26/2025 8:00:56 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

I respect your opinion w/o sharing it. I do not think Congress would claw back CHIP act awards in any case and POTUS cannot unilaterally do so nor would he want to since he sees that industry as vital for America’s future..

https://nevadacurrent.com/2025/08/26/blue-states-that-sued-kept-most-cdc-grants-while-red-states-feel-brunt-of-trump-clawbacks/


36 posted on 08/26/2025 8:05:24 AM PDT by JayGalt (For America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

I don’t see any discretion here. Perhaps I am missing it.

“The government’s equity stake will be funded by the remaining $5.7 billion in grants previously awarded, but not yet paid, to Intel under the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act and $3.2 billion awarded to the company as part of the Secure Enclave program.”


37 posted on 08/26/2025 8:08:11 AM PDT by JayGalt (For America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson