Posted on 08/21/2025 9:31:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Most of the time, you don't want to be a Debbie Downer on the current trends. The pro-freedom side of the political spectrum is currently on a winning streak with President Trump at the helm, and it's becoming more than amusing to say, “Yes, we voted for this.” However, you also must be clear-eyed about emerging threats on the horizon, and thus, we need to consider the serious issue of the dangerous combination of the incredibly biased Wikipedia and A.I.
It only makes sense to cast a wary eye toward A.I. systems and Wikipedia, and they're teaming up to compound the problem. This may not matter with most subjects, given that there is some transparency with the latter, but when taken in combination with the always murky A.I. processes and controversial subjects, we have a recipe for disaster. A recent PragerU video gives a short overview of the dangers involved:
It's vitally important to ask the questions: Can you trust Wikipedia? Can you trust the A.I. systems that use Wikipedia as a source? Because this is the source cited in most Google search results and regurgitated by A.I. systems.
As related in the video, 2016 was a watershed moment for the left. When Donald Trump unexpectedly trounced Hillary Clinton in what was supposed to be her coronation, the left became determined to control the internet, or they would lose again. Thus, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) — Wikipedia's parent organization, under the direction of executive director Katherine Maher — implemented the Wikimedia Movement Strategy.
Anti-liberty leftists made it their mission to remake Wikipedia from an encyclopedia into a social justice platform. Internal documents that are now public detail a shift toward what the WMF termed “knowledge equity”:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Russigate
Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections:
The Russian government conducted foreign electoral interference in the 2016 United States elections with the goals of sabotaging the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, boosting the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, and increasing political and social discord in the United States.
Source:
Wikipedia
Where’s the problem?
avoid Wikipedia on all political, health, and climate
On economics and technology also, Wiki is inaccurate and biased. Its authors favor one technology over another for no obvious reason except bias. It authors favor one explanation for inflation over another for no obvious reason.
I was about to post something very similar. I go to Wiki often, but strictly for things like biographical information on public figures in various fields and just basic facts and figures. But nothing that involves judgement, or interpretation of history or current events, etc.
Garbage in, garbage out.
bump
This forum itself could become populated with accounts that that are run by AI engaging in discussion...and how would we tell?
Darn it, you’re onto me.
Ah ha! You don’t full me!
... nor do you *fool* me. LOL (well you can tell that blunder wasn’t AI, can’t you?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.