“Just have her take a DNA test at a neutral medical center location and make the results visible to all.”
Wow... SMH... that there is totalitarian given the source of aggitation. Candy needs to suffer litigation or shut her pie hole. But... Candy might be right and a lawsuit might force the indignity.
Would you like a forced whiz quiz or DNA test to prive your sex publicly?
A quick finger wave perhaps in front of witnesses perhaps?
In the same line of questioning...would you offer a DNA test to put such questions to rest and resolve any controversy?
Instead, the Macrons have chosen the dog and pony show.
It makes one wonder what is really going on in this case.
JMO, YMMV
That maybe one of the most ignorant things I have ever heard.
Nobody would be "forcing" anyone to do anything. If someone accused me of ANYTHING and the accusation upset me so much that I wanted to sue and I could easily disprove the accusation by doing something as simple as taking a test....I would be driving at 90 MPH to the nearest testing facility to disprove the accusation as quickly as I could.
If someone accused you of being at a gay strip club last Saturday but you had video footage proving you were at home...would they be "forcing" you to release video footage from your home to prove you don't go to gay night clubs? Or would you happily release the footage to prove your accusers are liars?
Not quite.
The Macrons will have first-person, admissible evidence that Ms. Macron was born female - her own testimony. May also have a birth certificate, documents from the birth of her own children, etc..
What first-person, admissible evidence does Ms. Owen have that isn't true? Absent some kind of affirmative, admissible evidence on her side, I think it is unlikely a judge would conclude that the Macrons have to submit a DNA test to prove something for which there is no reasonable factual dispute.
It would not bother me in the slightest to have a dna test and announce my sex.
I have nothing to hide and am proud of being a bio male.