Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Here is Grok’s conclusion…

“The Hittites in Deuteronomy 7:1 are likely a localized Canaanite group, possibly with cultural or ethnic ties to the Anatolian Hittites of Uşaklı Höyük, but not identical to them. The biblical Hittites were part of the Canaanite nations targeted for removal due to their idolatrous practices, as per the divine command to prevent cultural corruption. The Hittites of Uşaklı Höyük, as described in the article, represent the imperial Hittite civilization, whose influence reached Canaan but whose core was in Anatolia. While not the exact same group, the Canaanite Hittites in Deuteronomy may reflect a southern extension of this broader Hittite cultural sphere, as archaeological evidence suggests Hittite presence in Canaan during the relevant period.

“Ongoing DNA and paleobotanical studies at Uşaklı Höyük, as mentioned in the article, may further clarify the relationship between these populations, potentially revealing whether the Hittites in Canaan shared genetic or cultural markers with their Anatolian counterparts. For now, the connection is plausible but not definitive, as the biblical term likely applies to a localized subgroup within the broader Hittite cultural framework.


31 posted on 08/17/2025 5:15:38 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️ LIFE )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: aMorePerfectUnion

Since it’s just a fact that the name “Hittites” was borrowed from the OT to refer to a previously unknown and unrelated group hundreds of miles to the north, Grok and you should get a new hobby.


36 posted on 08/21/2025 5:34:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson