Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Macoozie

“”””In America, there should be no “license” to get married. (look up the shocking history of it in the US).””””

Shocking that Jefferson had a marriage license and did divorce law, that George Washington paid for his nephew’s marriage license, that Revolutionary War widows had to be legally married to collect their dead husband’s pension?


35 posted on 08/16/2025 11:52:40 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

A license implies permission.
Permission implies authority.
Marriage and Union are very different from a legal contract.

Most states did not require marriage licenses until the 20th century. Often put in place to control who was allowed to marry.

Cherry picking establishment folks from developed Colonial Possesions does not support the claim.

If Flying Spaghetti monster is your choice, then a Pastafarian Union is the path, not a state license.

Don’t mix the two: a State contract with State duties and obligations vs a Union of Persons with private contractual obligations and duties.
They are not the same.

And abandoned children still happens, even with the hallowed license.

Folks can create the benefits and rights by legal contract, and don’t need a marriage license.

Black and white couldn’t get a license. Homosexuals couldn’t get a license.
So the marriage license law was bad before but now it’s all good?

No thank you.
Government has no business in it.

I will leave this exchange here for folks to review.
Peace to you my friend.


46 posted on 08/16/2025 2:26:02 PM PDT by Macoozie (Roll MAGA, roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson