If your most resent reply is supposed to contain a simple question, I missed it. It was simply continued beligerence. You claimed that I failed to answer a simple question. I claim that I do not know what your question is. I do not mean to obfuscate, but honestly, I do not know what your question is.
If your question was
“What does maxwell’s equation have to do with it?”
I answered:
“As an example, I thought that that was obvious.”
You had raised what I took to be beligerent objections to “theories”, which struck me as infantile. I thought that you might accept that Maxwell’s Equations as an expression of a scientific theory that is both widely accepted, and useful.
I answered: “As an example, I thought that that was obvious.”
—
‘Obvious’ is not a specific answer. So try again.
“Maxwell’s Equations as an expression of a scientific theory that is both widely accepted, and useful.”
From that answer you show you have little knowledge of who Maxwell was and what he originally postulated, nor the faintest idea how Heaviside change his equations - which can be fairly said are actually Heaviside’s, since they are not even the same sort of equation, nor have anything to do with the original postulate.