And I finally put my finger on what's been bugging me about it while I read it.
It's all the info that he doesn't follow up on. Trails that he allows to grow cold. Including the one I notated this morning, Epstein related, that really should have been checked out.
Instead he offers up a tidbit of info that's not well known to the general public related to a bit that is better known, but apparently refuses to see if the inference one can draw from it is correct.
Come on, Mr. Lownie, you can at least note the incredible coincidence, eh? That's not libelous.
Though it would be food for thought...
...noted...