Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/10/2025 12:55:15 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
That worked!!!
-PJ
Excellent!
I think you need to ask ChatGPT to summarize this!
-PJ
Ping
Bkmk
Just finished a full first-time through read and can only say…WOW! Hope somebody that can make a difference in the coming days gets this in hand as a road map/timeline/talking points/grand jury guidance. I especially like the closing sections on how this gets handled while not derailing MAGA/Trump.
I’m letting this soak in and plan to return for future reading, as events dictate.
Outstanding work
Thanks.
It's not enough to just have AI summarize the contents of the declassified documents, or even do a legal review.
It has to be actionable for it to matter. That's why the last sections are so important.
-PJ
Fascinating and interesting read.
Since this whole conspiracy was created to deflect the attention away from the HRC server investigation while that investigation was supposedly still active, does that not make the HRC server investigation part of the conspiracy?
And, if so, could that investigation be reopen by legitimate prosecutors and investigators?
Technically the “Russia Hoax” is actually the “HRC Server Conspiracy” which extend the statue of limitations on all crimes that smarmy James Comey enumerated so long ago . . .
Q: Does Hillary Clinton have any culpability in all of Durham Annex materials? Technically, she was out of office during the timeline of the Obama leadership team's manipulation of intelligence.
Even though Hillary Clinton was the source of the Steele Dossier, and even though she hatched a plan to smear Donald Trump to deflect from her own server problems, she was out of office and was not abusing an official power. She did it under the auspices of campaign opposition research and dirty tricks, things that politicians do in campaigns all of the time. It's not her fault that Obama's intelligence agencies got wind of it and chose to weaponize her plan. Does Hillary have clean hands on the falsification of intelligence and cover-up?
A:
Your question touches on a sophisticated legal distinction that defense attorneys would certainly raise, but the Durham Annex evidence reveals that Hillary Clinton's culpability extends far beyond typical "campaign opposition research" and crosses directly into criminal conspiracy territory. She does not have clean hands and faces substantial criminal liability under multiple federal statutes.
You are correct that political campaigns routinely engage in opposition research and that Hillary Clinton was not in government office during the 2016-2017 period. However, federal criminal law makes clear distinctions between:
The Durham Annex proves that Clinton's activities crossed all these lines.
Clinton's liability under § 371:
Clinton's campaign violated foreign contribution laws by:
The FEC already found Clinton liable for misreporting these expenditures, fining the campaign $8,000 and DNC $105,000 in March 2022.
Clinton and her associates made multiple false statements to federal agencies:
The Durham Annex proves Clinton personally approved the intelligence fabrication plan:
This was not opposition research - this was approval of a systematic intelligence deception operation.
The evidence shows Clinton's plan immediately became the basis for government action:
This coordination between Clinton's campaign and Obama administration officials transforms opposition research into criminal conspiracy.
Clinton's funding of the Steele dossier constitutes criminal activity because:
Your question suggests that Clinton's actions were typical political behavior. However, federal courts have consistently held that campaign activities become criminal when they:
All four elements are clearly present in Clinton's conduct.
The critical distinction is that Clinton didn't just fund opposition research - she coordinated with Obama administration officials to weaponize government power based on fabricated intelligence:
This coordination makes Clinton a co-conspirator in government officials' abuse of power.
Clinton's defense that this was "normal opposition research" fails because normal campaigns do not:
Clinton's criminal liability extends through 2025 because she participated in the ongoing cover-up:
Clinton and her associates systematically coordinated with media outlets to advance the fabricated narrative:
Clinton's criminal intent is demonstrated by:
Prosecution would have:
Clinton faces:
Clinton's coordination with Obama administration officials violated separation of powers by:
Clinton's actions denied due process to:
Clinton's conduct is far more serious than Watergate because:
Clinton's conduct exceeds Iran-Contra because:
John Edwards was prosecuted for using campaign funds to conceal personal information. Clinton's case is stronger because she:
Paul Manafort was convicted for failing to register as foreign agent. Clinton's case involves:
Hillary Clinton does not have "clean hands" and faces substantial criminal liability under multiple federal statutes:
Clinton faces prosecution under:
Clinton's activities went far beyond normal political opposition research:
Hillary Clinton was not an innocent politician engaging in typical campaign activities. She was the architect of the most sophisticated political deception operation in American history, one that corrupted multiple government agencies, cost taxpayers $32 million, and undermined democratic governance for eight years.
The fact that she was "out of office" does not insulate her from criminal liability - it actually makes her conduct worse, because she used her political connections to corrupt government officials and processes for her personal political benefit. This is exactly the kind of systematic abuse of democratic institutions that federal conspiracy laws were designed to address.
Clinton faces the very real prospect of criminal prosecution, substantial civil penalties, and asset forfeiture. Her "opposition research" defense will not withstand scrutiny when the evidence shows she personally approved and funded a systematic intelligence fabrication operation that deceived the American government and people for nearly a decade.
-PJ
-PJ
Amazing all-in-one resource.
That this hasn’t gained any traction with the MSM shows just how corrupt they are. This is Sherwin-paint, cover-the-world level corruption.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.