[yesthatjallen]

Rogan can do good in-depth interviews with news makers. He falls flat when he gives the loony fringe equal billing.

I don't mind that he has these interviews but he never challenges them and seem to believe anything they say.

[fr_freak]

Rogan can do good in-depth interviews with news makers. He falls flat when he gives the loony fringe equal billing. I don't mind that he has these interviews but he never challenges them and seem to believe anything they say.

How is Rogan supposed to challenge them? For that matter, why would Rogan challenge them? The purpose of having someone on the show is to allow them to present their evidence for their theory. Rogan's not an archaeologist, nor has he, to my knowledge, ever studied the subject. On what basis, then, would he "challenge them"? And what would be the value of any interview where the host simply says "I don't believe you because it doesn't match the conventional narrative"?

And, for what it's worth, Rogan has had members of the archaeological community on his show with counter arguments to people like Hancock.