In October 2020 Tucker Carlson unexpectedly announced he would not be "piling on" Hunter Biden. He stated that he wouldn't be sharing further details about Hunter Biden's personal life, reasoning Hunter was a "fallen man".
Loomer continued…
The USB drive was a smoking gun, with validated metadata, unbroken digital chains of custody, and corroboration from known financial records. This was not raw, unverified data—it was intelligence-grade evidence of corruption at the highest levels of American politics, implicating a presidential candidate’s immediate family.
The executive producer reviewed portions of the material on-site and expressed immediate interest, assuring the source that Carlson himself would broadcast the findings within 48 hours. The producer took possession of the USB drive and access credentials to a secure cloud archive mirroring its contents. The stage was set for a seismic revelation that could sway undecided voters in key swing states. But, what followed was not Tucker Carlson’s bombshell broadcast that was promised—it was silence.
🚨 The Suppression: A Convenient “Lost in the Mail” Excuse By Tucker Carlson 🚨
Days after the handover of the USB drive, Carlson took to his Fox News program, Tucker Carlson Tonight on October 28, 2020, and delivered a peculiar claim: a USB drive containing “important documents related to Hunter Biden” had been “lost in the mail.”
This explanation raised immediate red flags. Internal communications later obtained by the source revealed that there was no evidence of the mailing of the drive by Carlson’s team. The “lost in the mail” narrative was a fabrication, a deliberate misdirection to deflect scrutiny and to bury the story to protect Tucker Carlson’s longtime friend, Hunter Biden.
When they claimed the drive was lost in the mail, Tucker Carlson and his team never reached out to the source again to get another copy or to follow up. They ghosted the source.
This act of suppression was not a mere oversight or logistical error—it was a calculated decision to withhold evidence of national significance. Carlson, a figure trusted by millions of conservative viewers, had the opportunity to expose corruption that could have reshaped the public’s perception of Joe Biden. Instead, he chose to spike the story, ensuring it never reached the airwaves in the critical final days of the 2020 Presidential election.
🚨 The Electoral Impact: A Missed Opportunity to Sway Swing States 🚨
The suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story had measurable consequences. According to internal Republican National Committee (RNC) swing-state analytics reviewed in November 2020, a full broadcast exposé by Carlson would have reached millions of viewers and influenced 2.8% to 3.4% of undecided voters in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. These margins were significant—Joe Biden’s final victory margins in these states were razor-thin:
Michigan: Biden “won” by 154,188 votes (2.8%).
Pennsylvania: Biden “won” by 80,555 votes (1.2%).
Wisconsin: Biden “won” by 20,682 votes (0.6%).
We know the election was stolen, but those were the margins of the stolen “victory”.
Had Carlson aired the Hunter Biden laptop story, the shift in voter sentiment could have flipped these battleground states, potentially altering the outcome of the 2020 election. By choosing silence, Carlson denied the American public access to high-confidence intelligence about a presidential candidate’s vulnerabilities to foreign influence, corruption, and criminal activity. This was not just a journalistic failure—it was a betrayal of public trust with far-reaching consequences.
Shortly after the 2020 election, Tucker Carlson’s own text messages were later requested as part of the Discovery process in the Fox News-Dominion lawsuit. His text messages revealed communications between himself and his producers in which he said he hated President Trump, and he couldn’t wait till the day he no longer had to talk about Trump on air anymore because he considers Trump to be a “Demonic force”.