Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/04/2025 9:59:34 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Good point about Bobulinski
Yes, he had Bobulinski on before the election, and FNC boasted about the high ratings they got for the show.
Carlson may not have liked to talk about the laptop and he may have said that, but he didn’t bury the story.
. Tucker Carlson hosted the first interview with Tony Bobulinski after the story broke. He covered it endlessly on FNC. Same with Devin Archer. Everyone who broke the story is calling out Loomer's lies--especially Miranda Devine and Sohrab Ahmari. She is getting roasted on X
. I cannot understand why anybody takes this obviously deranged girl seriously. Just look at her. How many mentally stable people would undergo tens of thousands of dollars of plastic surgery to look like the love child of Jigsaw and Pennywise? But the real question is, who is paying her for these lies she is telling?
“ I never trusted the Tuckster, even after he “turned.” I don’t think Rush did either, always calling him “Chatsworth Osborne, Jr.” Rush (like I) never made up nicknames for friends.”
**************************************
“Rush never made up nicknames for friend”? Really? Was Bo Snerdley a friend of Rush?
He had nicknames for Mark Levin that he was friends with and others as well.
I don't remember that much about Fox News. They may have mentioned it.
The story was that the New York Post was censored on every social media platform.
I don't think anyone on Fox News dared to cover the story in depth.
Laura Loomer is a grifter. I would hope most have figured that out by now.
"And one of the characters was this uppity, elitist, snobbish, know-nothing character named Chatsworth Osborne, Jr"
Rush Limbaugh
Ten minutes of Tucker on October 14, 2020, on the Hunter laptop story.
https://x.com/i/status/1952186397730701331
Tucker is an enigma in his interviews. He lets his subjects present their moralistic screeds without challenge. For instance, in the recent interview with Lt. Col. Aguilar, the retired Army officer presents his viewpoints blaming those taking aid to Gaza for alleged war crimes, without any challenge on how Hamas is mostly responsible. He reports those providing aid are the war criminals, without any evidence. Tucker would not challenge the assertions of Lt. Col. Aguilar.
Tucker is admirable to report on what is not being reported by the media, but Tucker requires much scrutiny.
In October 2020 Tucker Carlson unexpectedly announced he would not be "piling on" Hunter Biden. He stated that he wouldn't be sharing further details about Hunter Biden's personal life, reasoning Hunter was a "fallen man".
Demonstrably untrue
Bo wanted a nickname so people did not recognize him.
Loomer continued…
The USB drive was a smoking gun, with validated metadata, unbroken digital chains of custody, and corroboration from known financial records. This was not raw, unverified data—it was intelligence-grade evidence of corruption at the highest levels of American politics, implicating a presidential candidate’s immediate family.
The executive producer reviewed portions of the material on-site and expressed immediate interest, assuring the source that Carlson himself would broadcast the findings within 48 hours. The producer took possession of the USB drive and access credentials to a secure cloud archive mirroring its contents. The stage was set for a seismic revelation that could sway undecided voters in key swing states. But, what followed was not Tucker Carlson’s bombshell broadcast that was promised—it was silence.
🚨 The Suppression: A Convenient “Lost in the Mail” Excuse By Tucker Carlson 🚨
Days after the handover of the USB drive, Carlson took to his Fox News program, Tucker Carlson Tonight on October 28, 2020, and delivered a peculiar claim: a USB drive containing “important documents related to Hunter Biden” had been “lost in the mail.”
This explanation raised immediate red flags. Internal communications later obtained by the source revealed that there was no evidence of the mailing of the drive by Carlson’s team. The “lost in the mail” narrative was a fabrication, a deliberate misdirection to deflect scrutiny and to bury the story to protect Tucker Carlson’s longtime friend, Hunter Biden.
When they claimed the drive was lost in the mail, Tucker Carlson and his team never reached out to the source again to get another copy or to follow up. They ghosted the source.
This act of suppression was not a mere oversight or logistical error—it was a calculated decision to withhold evidence of national significance. Carlson, a figure trusted by millions of conservative viewers, had the opportunity to expose corruption that could have reshaped the public’s perception of Joe Biden. Instead, he chose to spike the story, ensuring it never reached the airwaves in the critical final days of the 2020 Presidential election.
🚨 The Electoral Impact: A Missed Opportunity to Sway Swing States 🚨
The suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story had measurable consequences. According to internal Republican National Committee (RNC) swing-state analytics reviewed in November 2020, a full broadcast exposé by Carlson would have reached millions of viewers and influenced 2.8% to 3.4% of undecided voters in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. These margins were significant—Joe Biden’s final victory margins in these states were razor-thin:
Michigan: Biden “won” by 154,188 votes (2.8%).
Pennsylvania: Biden “won” by 80,555 votes (1.2%).
Wisconsin: Biden “won” by 20,682 votes (0.6%).
We know the election was stolen, but those were the margins of the stolen “victory”.
Had Carlson aired the Hunter Biden laptop story, the shift in voter sentiment could have flipped these battleground states, potentially altering the outcome of the 2020 election. By choosing silence, Carlson denied the American public access to high-confidence intelligence about a presidential candidate’s vulnerabilities to foreign influence, corruption, and criminal activity. This was not just a journalistic failure—it was a betrayal of public trust with far-reaching consequences.
Shortly after the 2020 election, Tucker Carlson’s own text messages were later requested as part of the Discovery process in the Fox News-Dominion lawsuit. His text messages revealed communications between himself and his producers in which he said he hated President Trump, and he couldn’t wait till the day he no longer had to talk about Trump on air anymore because he considers Trump to be a “Demonic force”.
He had freaking Tony Bobulinski on his show TWICE. This a a lie.
Not surprising.
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2020/06/05/why-chatsworth-osborne-jr/
RUSH:
“I was nine or 10 years old when the show ran. I’m not even sure my memory of it is accurate. But what you need to know is that it was an affectionate nickname. (interruption) Yeah, Dwayne Hickman. That’s right. You’ll recognize him. Dwayne Hickman was Dobie Gillis, the star of the show. You’ll recognize Chatsworth Osborne, Jr. He’s a character actor that’s been in stuff for 60 years, 50 years at least. Anyway, I’m glad you called out there, Mark. Now, that’s a great Open Line Friday question. And, Mark, were you offended by that or were you worried that Chatsworth would be offended by it? (interruption) Okay, good. Good. ‘Cause there was no offense ever intended.”
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH:
“No, no, no, no. I was not describing Tucker as a no-nothing elitist. It’s a physical similarity, Chatsworth Osborne, Jr. And I named him that when Tucker was hosting Crossfire back on CNN.”
‘Snerdly’ was a name Rush said he used throughout his career.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.