Cantraey to what you are presuming, the authoors temper their own experimental results with their warning as follows:
"Although the results of this study are promising, it is important to note that further research is needed before this can be implemented in practice. Research in mice is only the first step toward a potential treatment in humans. Therefore, the findings of this study cannot be applied to humans just yet."Let your readers be so warned as you should have been. But as to your identificsation and posting of this article, a good job!
A couple of things to note:
1. I fit the article into the 300 word excerpt limit, so everyone sees the full version link at the bottom, where it says “(Excerpt) Read more at…”
2. The excerpt I did include clearly states it was done on mice—multiple times.
3. No one here is self-treating for sepsis.
4. If someone is in the hospital, chances are that their doctors, or the doctors of someone they know who has sepsis have not read this new study in Cell Reports and they can pass this on. Adding a little Vitamin B1 and glucose is not likely a negative in treatment for sepsis in humans, as you know.
5. I am the last person who would tell people to wait 15 years for a Cochrane Review of a dozen studies on this specific protocol before considering telling your doctor to consider it. I believe people should have the opportunity to profit from cutting edge health material—because doctors can't stay educated enough, as it is, and yes I get near-daily updates from Medscape—for over 20 years.
6. In my “Take Charge of Your Health” ping list (Post #2), I literally state: “This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.”
I believe I have more than adequately covered any concern with any study I am posting. I will not hold back cutting edge information and I am not holding back any context, either.