“Can you please share your reasons why not?”
Only need one. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that space aliens have visited or are vising Earth. There is nothing to believe. No proof so there is nothing to cover-up.
That’s a philosophical and logical error—lack of evidence is not proof. A claim of fact requires more than a gap in evidence.
“Only need one. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that space aliens have visited or are visiting Earth. There is nothing to believe.”
Objectively by the very same standard this is the very same with God, and the concept that Jesus was any more than just a man, or even that he truly existed at all. No true physical evidence, not even any fuzzy pictures. There is actually no so called proof other than the creative imagination of man as a second party account that objectively may or may not be real.
But who has any right to tell others not to discuss or believe in God, Jesus, and the Bible? JD also claims to be a Christian and believes in God. Who has any right to tell him he cannot because there is no proof God or Jesus exists? No one has that right... Yet JD has indeed talked about getting to the bottom of the UFO disclosures several times now himself. So to call one a delusion and the other not is a double standard.
And it is OK, there is nothing wrong at all with being objectively curious about the concept. Real or not it is absolutely acceptable to contemplate the idea. Politically incorrect out of the box thinking is why we do not still believe the Earth is flat. Or that man will never fly.
My point is just because you do not believe that does not give you the right to go out of your way to tell others that they can’t even discuss the concept just because you do not personally believe it. With that said there actually is circumstantial and eye witness evidence of other world entities.
Millions of eye witness accounts. They are not all delusional and/or liars. It is impossible that so many can see the same things and tell the same stories in detail as each other. And there is documented historical proof from a time when the whole modern concept of “Flying Saucers” was even labelled.
There are paintings of UFOs that go back to the 1300s. And many since that literally depict “Flying Saucers” before they were ever even labelled “Flying Saucers”. If the concept is a modern delusion or lie then how could this be possible? How could they even imagine what they look like and accurately depict them without actually being eye witnesses themselves? It would be impossible...
Now why am I personally so sure about their existence? Because I am a three time observer of the phenomenon myself. I am not a liar, and I am not delusional. And I have a VERY good understanding of physics and flight dynamics. So I have no choice but to support belief, there is absolutely no question. I would have to call myself a liar to do anything different. And tell you what, once seen they cannot be unseen... Things will never the same after you witness it for yourself.